understanding of abnormal cues

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Criterion
High Distinction (285%)
Distinction
(75-84%)
Provides thorough understanding of
abnormal cues
Credit (65
74%)
Provides solidinformation and some
understanding of abnormal cues.
Provides a comprehensive understanding
of abnormal cues.
Pass
(50-54%)
Provides some information regarding
abnormal cues
Fail
1549%)
Minimal or no information regarding
abnormal cues
Q1: Provide responses to stage three and four of CRC by
processing the information and identifying all abnormal cues
and a discussion of why they are abnormal
(564)
(10%)
02: Using literature, provide a discussion of the
pathophysiology, and how this relates to the two (2)
issues/problems
(8.5.10)
75-8.4
Provides a comprehensive discussion of the Provides a thorough discussion of the
underlying pathophysiology of the 2 patient underlying pathophysiology of the 2
issues/problems justified by literature and patient issues/problems justified by
comprehensively links to case study literature and strong links to case study.
(6.5-74)
Provides solid discussion of the
pathophysiology of the 2 patient
issues/problems with solid justification
by literature and some links to case
study.
Provides some discussion, and
identification of the underlying
pathophysiology of the 2 patient
issues/problems with weak inks to
literature and minimal links to case
study
10.4.9)
Minimal or no discussion and
identification of the underlying
pathophysiology of identified
issues problems. Inadequate use of
literature and discussion not linked to
case study
(20%)
03: Establish goals and nursing care interventions
strategies the registered nurse would implement to provide
care.
(17-20)
Two goals clearly identified using SMART
objectives. A comprehensive list of
appropriate nursing care interventions
stated
13-149)
Two goals clearly identified. Solid and
appropriate nursing care interventions
stated
(10-129
Two goals identified and nursing care
interventions stated
10-9.9)
Less than two goals and nursing care
interventions are identfied.
(15-16.9)
(
Two goals are clearly identified using
SMART objectives. A thorough list of
appropriate nursing care interventions
stated.
(7.5-8.4
Two (2) nursing care interventions
stated. There is thorough justification or
evaluation provided. Solid referencing of
literature to support discussion
(10%)
(6.5-7.4)
Two (2) nursing care interventions
stated. There is solid justification or
evaluation provided. Some literature to
support discussion
(5-6.4)
10.4.9)
Two (2) nursing care interventions Less than two (2) nursing care
stated. There is some justification or interventions stated. There is little/no
evaluation provided. Minimal literature to justification or evaluation provided.
support discussion
(8.5-10)
04: Provide a rationale for two interventions (Chosen from Two (2) nursing care interventions stated.
the table in Question 3) and discuss how the interventions There is comprehensive justification or
would be evaluated
evaluation provided. Comprehensive
Justify with literature to support.
referencing of literature to support
discussion
(25%)
(21.25 -25)
Q5: Select two medications that were prescribed for the Comprehensive information presented of
patient’s pre-operative condition. Provide the mechanism of mechanism of action, side effects correct
action, side effects correct dosage and contraindications for dosage and contraindications for each
each medication and how these might affect the patient post-medication
operatively
(2) and how these might affect the patient
post-operatively
(18.75-21)
Thorough information presented of
mechanism of action, side effects
correct dosage and contraindications for
each medication (2) and how these
might affect the patient post-operatively
(16 25-18,5)
Solid information presented of
mechanism of action, side effects
correct dosage and contraindications for
each medication (2) and how these
might affect the patient post-
operatively,
(125-16
Some information presented of
mechanism of action, side effects
correct dosage and contraindications for
each medication (2) and how these
might affect the patient post-
operatively
10-12.4)
Minimal or no information presented of
mechanism of action, side effects
correct dosage and contraindications for
each medication (2) and how these
might affect the patient post-
operatively
(15%)
06: Using the Roper-Logan Tierney Model, identify one (1)
potential biological, psychological Sociocultural
issue/problem and discuss how this will affect the patient
post-operatively or on discharge.
(12.75 – 15)
Provides comprehensive understanding of
the biological, psychological, sociocultural
factors influencing care for Geraldine and
her family by covering all the necessary
factors
(11.25 -12.74)
Provides a thorough understanding of
the biologicalpsychological
sociocultural factors influencing care for
Geraldine and her family by covering
most of the necessary factors
(9.75 – 11.24)
Provides an understanding of the
biological psychological, sociocultural
factors influencing care for Geraldine
and her family by covering a lot of the
necessary factors
(7.5-9.74)
Provides some understanding of the
biological psychological, sociocultural
factors influencing care for Geraldine
and her famly by covering some of the
necessary factors
(0 -7.4)
Does not identify the biological
psychological, sociocultural factors
influencing care for Geraldine and her
family
(10%)
Mechanics-Grammar, speling and punctuation.
(8.5-10)
There are no errors with grammar, speling
and punctuation that impact readability, and
the meaning is easily discemible. The case
study reads without interruption
(7.5-8.4)
There are no errors with grammar.
speling and punctuation that impact
readability, and the meaning is easily
discernible
(6.5-7.4)
There are minimal errors with grammar,
speling and punctuation that impact
readability, and the meaning is easily
15-6.4)
There are some errors with grammar,
spelling and punctuation that impact
readability. However, the meaning is
discemibie
discemble
(0.4.9)
There are substantial errors with
grammar, speling and punctuation that
impact readability. The errors detract
significantly, but the meaning is
discernible.
10-24
Four or more errons on the in-text
citation, referencing style and/or
reference list (Based on APA style)
Use of unauthoritative references (0.9.
Wikipedia)
15%)
Referencing
(425-5)
All in text citations and reference list are
correct and use APA style
Textbooks, authoritative websites,
systematic reviews and journal articles
provided
(3.75 -4.2)
One error in the in-text citation and/or
reference list (Based on APA style)
Textbooks, authoritative websites, and
journal articles provided
13.25 -3.7)
TWO errors in the in-text Citation and/or
reference list (Based on APA style).
Textbooks and authoritative websites
provided
(2.5-3.2)
Three errors in the in-text citation and/or
reference list (Based on APA style)
Textbooks provided
(5%)
(4.25 -5)
(3.75 -4.2)
(3.25 -3.7)
(2.5-32)
(0-24)

READ ALSO...   measures a bond’s sensitivity
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER