Systems Analysis and Design Social Marketing Proposal Behaviour Change Perspectives Application of Analysis Strategic Management…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 1 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
COURSE: Bachelor of Business (Information Systems Specialisation)
Unit Code:
SYAD 310
Unit Title:
Systems Analysis and Design
Type of Assessment:
Assessment 2 – Group Assignment
2000 (+/- 10 Percent) words for the report
Unit Learning Outcomes
2. Describe and apply iterative incremental systems software development processes,
such as structured, object-oriented and agile approaches
3. Critically analyse and verify business and system requirements, including producing
4. Analysis and design models for an information system
6. Work effectively as part of a team in the production of a systems requirements and
design document
Submission Date:
Written assignment submitted to Moodle in Week 10
Assessment Task:
A written assignment undertaken in groups of three or four students in the form of
systems requirements and systems design models addressing a problem case study.
Students may choose to adopt a waterfall or agile approach but must justify their
Total Mark:
40 Marks
40% of total unit marks
Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally signed
approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – Assignment Extension
Application Form – Student Login Required) or previously approved application for other extenuating
circumstances impacting course of study, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day,
calculated by deduction from the total mark.
For example. An Assessment Task marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for each calendar day.
More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy & Procedures
– Student Login Required)
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 2 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Case Study
Sydney Medical Centre
Sydney Medical Centre (SMC) is a growing practise in Sydney. The centre has grown recently and the owner, Dr
Edwin, wants to develop new information system to handle all business operation. Their current system is
inadequate to provide real time information to medical staff and access to medical information and patient need
to go physically to centre to retrieve their medical report.
As IT consultant you began your systems analysis phase by conducting interviews, reviewing existing reports, and
observing office operations. The SMC medical team perform service and medical procedure which are coded.
Code consist of two digit suffix and seven numeric digit. The new system will provide opportunity for significant
cost saving for SMC, and will help medical staff to go online and update medial information, check record and
schedule appointment as well as provide convenience for patient. The clinic required various report you learned
during your fact-finding exercise.
• Hourly appointment report, which shows the patients who are to be reminded of their next day’s
appointments. Information such as patient id, P_name, contact, appointment time, need to be recorded
• Daily appointment list for each provider. Information such as scheduled appointment times, P_names,
and procedure to be performed, including the code and description.
• Weekly provider report that lists each of the providers and the weekly charges, plus a
• Report on weekly patient statement, which includes the date, household name and contact, balance, total
charges, total payments, and balance.
• Monthly Insurance Company Report.
Addition to all the listed report, the SMC would like automated e-mail and text messaging capability for sending
patient reminders on appointment scheduling time. Finally, the new system needs to track employee schedules,
vacation information and payment.
For this project prepare report on type of information system, fact finding method most appropriate, system
development and draw Use case diagram, DFD, ERD diagram and show their relationship.
You are free to make any assumptions, but please mention them clearly in your report.
Write report on following question (12 marks)
1. What types of system requirements will you focus on for SMC? Explain each one in detail.
2. What fact-finding methods you think is appropriate for collecting information from employees at SMC?
Suggest at least three methods and explain the pros and cons of each.
3. Describe two systems development tools and two development methods you can used for system
development for SMC.
Modelling Exercise (18 Marks)
1. Create a use case diagram for SMC.
2. Prepare a context diagram for SMC information system.
3. Prepare a diagram level 0 DFD for SMC. Be sure to show numbered processes for handling patient
information, appointments, and report processing.
4. Create an initial ERD for the new system that contains at least four entities.
5. Analyse each relationship to determine if it is 1:1, 1: M, or M: N.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 3 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
The assignment must be submitted online in Moodle. Where additional documents need to be attached, all
materials MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats (e.g., pdf or MAC file) may
not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered
LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in MS Word. No paper based or hardcopy submission will be accepted.
Marking Criteria –
Max marks
Max marks
Lecturer Expectation
12 (4 marks for each question)
Show understanding of system
requirements, types of system
requirements, fact-finding methods and
tools and methods
DFD- 7
ERD- 7)
Reflect understanding of use case
diagram, DFD, ERD and relationship
Report structure
(1.5 mark for each criteria)
Cover Page, Executive Summary,
Introduction, Conclusion
In text and following proper Harvard style
referencing convention (You should use
at least 5 academic sources to write your
report) Your references should not be
more than 10 years old.
Total Marks
Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.
Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and
demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student
must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you
refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System
(Moodle). For details please click the link
and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks
and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each
Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise
specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any
paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.
Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard
Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 4 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task
in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is
generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books,
chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not
the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own
research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text
references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before
preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism
through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link:
A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located
in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online
dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but
should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources.
Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as
government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC),
or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and
government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly
very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites
(Why can’t I just Google?):
(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).

READ ALSO...   likely to strike within the United States
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services