SBM3206 Project Management plan the development of a web site Management & Information Systems MGMT6009 Managing People and Team…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Assessment Brief: SBM3206 Project Management Fundamentals and
Practices
<Trimester 1, 2021>
Assessment Overview
Assessment Task
Type
Weight
Length
Due
ULOs
Assessed
Assessment 1: Unit project –
Part A
This is an individual research project.
Students are required to describe
and discuss different phases of project life
cycle, develop WBS and network diagram of
the case project
Individual
25%
2000
words
Week 5
ULO1,
ULO2
Assessment 2: Unit project –
Part B
In the research project of part B, students
are required to analyse case project
schedule using critical path and program
evaluation and review technique (PERT)
analysis
Individual.
35%
2000
words
Week 9
ULO3,
ULO4,
ULO5
Assessment 3: Case Study
In this assessment, students are required to
analyse scenarios based on several case
studies
Individual
40%
2000
words
Week 12
ULO1,
ULO2,
ULO3,
ULO4,
ULO5
Assessment 1: Unit project – Part A
Due date:
Week 5
Group/individual:
Individual
Word count/Time provided:
2000 words
Weighting:
25%
Unit Learning Outcomes:
ULO-1, ULO-2
Assessment 1 Detail
This assessment is designed to assess the student’s understanding of the theoretical learning to
practical, real world situations.
This is a great opportunity for the students to demonstrate their ability:
Selection of a case project;
Appreciate the potential of theory in managerial decision making and problem solving, and
take managerial responsibility by designing a practical course of action (rather than merely
making recommendations).
A report covering the following points should be prepared:
1. Select a project at your target company
2. Provide background of the case project
3. Develop the project charter of the case project
4. Conduct of systemic literature review describing and discussing the different classification of project
life cycles and their associated phases and choose the best option for your case project
5. Develop work breakdown structure (WBS) of the case project featuring 4-6 levels and 20-30 boxes
6. Develop schedule plan (Activity List featuring 30-50 activities) including durations, sequencing, with
milestones, deliverables, and network diagram of the case project
A report of 2000 words summarising your report must be submitted on the due date. Your report
must have a cover page duly completed and signed, and it has to be fully referenced in Harvard
style.
In completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to Effectively present project planning,
which will help in achieving ULO1 and ULO2, this in turn will help you in achieving CLO-1, CLO-3, CLO-
5 and CLO-7, which collectively with other unit learning outcomes will help in achieving GA2, GA7,
GA12.
Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric
The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted <25%> of the total unit mark. The
marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric
Marking Criteria
Not Satisfactory
(0-49% of the criterion
mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64% of the criterion
mark)
Good
(65-74% of the criterion
mark)
Very Good
(75-84% of the criterion
mark)
Excellent
(85-100% of the criterion
mark)
Develop Project Charter (5
marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of developing
and using
project charter
Basic
knowledge
only of
developing
and using project charter
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using project charter
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using project charter
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
developing and
using project charter
Conduct of systemic
literature review describing
and
discussing the
different classification of
project life cycles and their
associated
phases (25 marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of different
phases of the
project cycle;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words
Basic
knowledge
only of
different
phases of
the project
cycle; limited
depth of
basic
concepts
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of different
phases of the
project cycle
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of different
phases of the
project cycle
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
different
phases of the
project cycle
Develop and
use
breakdown
structure (25 marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of developing
and using
breakdown
structure;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words
Basic
knowledge
only of
developing
and using
breakdown
structure;
limited
depth of
basic
concepts
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using
breakdown
structure
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using
breakdown
structure
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
developing and
using
breakdown
structure
Develop and
use
network
diagrams
(25 marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of developing
and using
network
diagrams;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words
Basic
knowledge
only of
developing
and using
network
diagram;
limited
depth of
basic
concepts
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using
network
diagram
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using
network
diagram
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
developing and
using
network
diagram
Writing and Presentation
(15 marks) – Evidence of
good academic writing; –
Free of any grammatical
errors; using correct
sentence structure;
applying an extensive range
of vocabulary; – Proper
introduction and
conclusion. Consistent
formatting with suitable
headings and sub-headings
– Consistent use of labels,
highlights, font weight and
underline
Inadequate Writing and
Presentation skills
Basic
Writing and Presentation
skills
Exhibits
breadth and
depth Writing and
Presentation skills
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of Writing and
Presentation skills
Displays
Exceptional Writing and
Presentation skills
Referencing (5 marks) –
Comprehensive Reference
list – Appropriate
Referencing using Harvard
guidelines
Inadequate
understanding
of Referencing
Basic
knowledge
only of Referencing
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using Referencing
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using Referencing
Displays
Exceptional
understanding
of developing
and using Referencing
Assessment 2: Unit project – Part B
Due date:
Week 9
Group/individual:
Individual
Word count/Time provided:
2000 words
Weighting:
35%
Unit Learning Outcomes:
ULO-3, ULO-4 and ULO-5
Assessment 2 Detail
This is an extension of part A research project.
A report covering the following points should be prepared:
1. Provide a comprehensive summary based on Assignment 1 (Part A)
2. Analyse project schedule using critical path, and program evaluation and review technique
(PERT) analysis.
3. Develop Project Budget and Cost Management Plan
3. After 3 months of project start, describe and assess the health of the case project using earned
value analysis.
4. Assess critically contemporary project management practices related to your case project.
A report of 2000 words summarising your report must be submitted on the due date. Your
report must have a cover page duly completed and signed, and it has to be fully referenced in
Harvard style.
Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric
The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted <35%> of the total unit mark. The
marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric
Marking Criteria
Not Satisfactory
(0-49% of the criterion
mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64% of the criterion
mark)
Good
(65-74% of the criterion
mark)
Very Good
(75-84% of the criterion
mark)
Excellent
(85-100% of the criterion
mark)
Analyse
project/
program
schedule
using critical
path (15 marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of analysing of
project/
program
schedule using
critical path;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words
Basic
knowledge
only of
analysing
of
project/program
schedule
using
critical
path
;
limited
depth of
basic
concepts
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of analysing of
project/program schedule
using critical
path,
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of analysing of
project/program schedule
using critical
path
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
analysing of
project/program schedule
using critical
path
Analyse
project/
program
schedule
using
program
evaluation
and review
technique
(PERT) analysis
(10 marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of analysing of
project/
program
schedule using
program
evaluation and
review
technique
(PERT) analysis;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words
Basic
knowledge
only of
analysing
of
project/program
schedule
using
program evaluation
and review
technique
(PERT)
analysis;
limited
depth of
basic
concepts
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of analysing of
project/program schedule
using
program
evaluation
and review technique
(PERT)
analysis
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of analysing of
project/program schedule
using
program evaluation and
review
technique
(PERT) analysis
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
analysing of
project/program schedule
using
program
evaluation and
review
technique
(PERT) analysis
Develop Project Budget and
Cost Management Plan (5
marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of Project Budget and Cost
Management Plan
Basic
knowledge
only of Project Budget and
Cost Management Plan
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of Project Budget and Cost
Management Plan
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of Project Budget and Cost
Management Plan
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of Project Budget and Cost
Management Plan
Assess the
health of a
project using
earned value
analysis (EVA)
(25 marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of EVA; cannot
discuss
concepts in
own words
Basic
knowledge
only of
EVA;
limited
depth of
basic
concepts
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of EVA
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of EVA
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application
Critically
assess
contemporary project
management
practices related to your
case project
(25 marks)
Inadequate
understanding
of critically
assessing
contemporary
project
management
practice;
cannot discuss
concepts in
own words
Basic
knowledge
only of
critically
assessing
contemporary project
management
practice;
limited
depth of
basic
concepts
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of critically
assessing
contemporary
project
management
practice
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of critically
assessing
contemporary
project
management
practice
Displays
exceptional
understanding
of concepts
and their
practical
application of
critically
assessing
contemporary
project
management
practice
Writing and Presentation
(15 marks) – Evidence of
good academic writing; –
Free of any grammatical
errors; using correct
sentence structure;
applying an extensive range
of vocabulary; – Proper
Inadequate Writing and
Presentation skills
Basic
Writing and Presentation
skills
Exhibits
breadth and
depth Writing and
Presentation skills
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of Writing and
Presentation skills
Displays
Exceptional Writing and
Presentation skills
introduction and
conclusion. Consistent
formatting with suitable
headings and sub-headings
– Consistent use of labels,
highlights, font weight and
underline
Referencing (5 marks) –
Comprehensive Reference
list – Appropriate
Referencing using Harvard
guidelines
Inadequate
understanding
of Referencing
Basic
knowledge
only of Referencing
Exhibits
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using Referencing
Exhibits
accurate and
detailed
breadth and
depth of
understanding
of developing
and using Referencing
Displays
Exceptional
understanding
of developing
and using Referencing

READ ALSO...   emotional development through the study of neuroscience
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER