Rationale – handed in before the facilitation Plan and Cost Basic Menus allow students to practice various theories legal and et…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

High Distinction
5.1- 6.4
Rationale – handed in before the facilitation
No evidence of thought put into the choice of topic or target group. No discussion on ethical considerations
Adequate level relevance and appropriateness. Basic discussion on ethical considerations.
Good level of relevance, appropriateness. A sound discussion of ethical considerations. A sound discussion of social work theories, models and methods that may be of relevance to chosen activity.
High level of relevance, appropriateness of chosen activity. A clear rationale, based on ethical considerations, theoretical understandings and potential needs of the group.
Exceptional level of relevance, appropriateness of chosen activity. Insightful rationale of activity underpinned by ethical considerations, strengths and limitations of social work theories and needs of the group
Evaluation and closure
No discussion of the outcomes and learning from the activity. No evidence of reflection on feedback in written rationale
Adequate discussion on outcomes of the activity; minimal reflection on feedback
Engaged discussion on outcomes, discussion of what went well and what could be done differently. Reflection demonstrates analysis of learning from activity. Demonstrated interest for feedback from the group participants.
High level discussion, considering group dynamics and group processes. A thorough analysis of group activity, linking back to ethical considerations and social work theory. Engaged interest in feedback from the group participants. This is included in written analysis.
Excellent processing of group dynamics and process. A well managed opportunity for group feedback on the group experience, positive and negative feelings addressed, pointers made to ongoing learning. Reflexivity demonstrated on feedback given from participants.
Assessment 2b: Written Rationale (10 marks). 500 words total (+ – 10% word-count leeway).
Each student will provide a personal written rationale for why they chose to facilitate their group presentation the way they did. This written rationale will discuss the type of group (e.g. psychoeducation) and the target group (e.g. young people). It will also discuss the ethical considerations and evaluate the outcome of the group experience. The rationale will include at least two references to support decision making. You must submit the rationale through vUWS, no more than one week after facilitating.
COMPLETE THIS SECTION BEFORE FACILITATION EXERCISE (approx. 250 words): Why did you choose this type of group? Why did you choose this target group? What ethical considerations did you make?
COMPLETE THIS SECTION AFTER FACILITATION EXERCISE AND GROUP DE-BRIEFING (approx. 250 words): What was the outcome of the group experience that you facilitated (perhaps offer strengths and limitations)? What learning did you gain from this facilitation exercise?
TIPS: Include a reference list (WSU Harvard Style, listed in alphabetical order) and place on separate page; Offer strengths and limitations of your facilitation (how did you know you did well? What can you improve on for next time?); Mention how this experience will inform your next attempt at group facilitation.

READ ALSO...   Prosecutor’s power
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services