Project Management Lifecycle

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

PROJ6000_Assessment 1 Brief_081118.Docx Page 1 of 5
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title
PROJ6000 Principles of Project Management
Assessment 1 – Project Management Lifecycle (PML)
opinion post and peer response
Individual
800 words
Successful completion of this assignment will result in
achievement of the following subject learning
outcomes:
1. Understand PMBOK knowledge areas and process
groups and their role, relevance and impact on
project management best practice and PMI’s Code
of Ethics.
2. Critically compare and contrast project
management approaches and their
appropriateness for managing a variety of project
types, including IT projects.
By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 2
25%
25 Marks
Assessment
Individual/Group Length Learning Outcomes Submission Weighting Total Marks
PROJ6000_Assessment 1 Brief_081118.Docx Page 2 of 5
Context:
The project management lifecycle (PML) is an important component of project management
methodology. It incorporates several areas of knowledge from the Project Management
Body of Knowledge (PMBoK) and it affects and interacts with the application of PMBoK in a
project. Different stages of the PML may require focussing on different areas of the PMBoK,
and project managers need to assess the PML for their project to identify possible risks, plan
for resourcing and commence communicating with stakeholders. This assessment requires
that you answer the following question:
“What areas of the PMBoK are affected by the Project Management Lifecycle the most
and how do we ensure alignment between the lifecycle of the project and the
implementation of PMBoK in projects?”. To answer this question, you will need to:
(a) Post a 600 word response to this question, based on your opinion, to the Discussion
Forum on the learning portal.
(b) Respond to one other student post by critiquing their opinion and comparing it with
yours in 200 words.
The assessment requires that you critically read and interpret both the Project Management
Lifecycle and the PMBoK.
Instructions:
1. Read about the PMBoK and the Project Management Lifecycle to familiarise yourself
with their fundamental concepts. Critically reflect on your readings to form an opinion of
both. Commence writing your opinion to answer the question and support that opinion
by using at least six (6) references from academic or industry literature. Cite these
references in your opinion of 600 words both in-text and as a reference list at the end of
your opinion piece. The word count does not include the reference list and is +/-10%.
2. Read one other student’s post. Think about their opinion and try to compare and
contrast it to yours. This will allow you to “critique” their view. You can do this by
highlighting the things you agree with and those you disagree with in their post. You
need to justify and explain your critique of their opinion. Try, where possible, to refer to
some of the literature you read or even your own working experiences. You will need to
write 200 words in your response. This does not include the reference list and is +/- 10%.
PROJ6000_Assessment 1 Brief_081118.Docx Page 3 of 5
Output and Submission:
Submit your completed assessment by the end of module 2 (Week 4) on Blackboard.
Learning Resources:
Hermano, V., & Martín-Cruz, N. (2019). Expanding the Knowledge on Project Management
Standards: A Look into the PMBOK® with Dynamic Lenses. In Project Management and
Engineering Research (pp. 19-34). Springer, Cham.
http://dspace.aeipro.com/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/754/CIDIP2016_01013.pdf?s
equence=1&isAllowed=y
Marion, J. W. (2018). Project management: a common sense guide to the pmbok (Vol. Part
one, framework and schedule, Ser. Industrial and systems engineering collection).
Momentum Press. https://lesa.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1024148050.
Assessment Criteria:
The assessment will be graded using the Learning Rubrics below. This is an individual
assignment and worth 25%.
Learning Rubrics – Part A
Assessment Attributes
Fail (0-49)
Pass (50-64)
Credit (65-
74)
Distinction (75-84)
High Distinction (85-
100)
Content, Audience and
Purpose
25%
Demonstrates no awareness of
context and/or purpose of the
assignment.
Demonstrates
limited awareness
of context and/or
purpose of the
assignment
Demonstrates
consistent
awareness of
context and/or
purpose of the
assignment.
Demonstrates an
advanced and integrated
understanding of context
and/or purpose of the
assignment.
Consistently demonstrates
a systematic and critical
understanding of context
and purpose of the
assignment.
Correct citation of key
resources and evidence
25%
Demonstrates inconsistent use of
good quality, credible and relevant
resources to support and develop
ideas.
There are mistakes in the APA style.
Demonstrates use
of credible and
relevant resources
to support and
develop ideas, but
these are not
always explicit or
well developed.
There are no
mistakes in the
APA style.
Demonstrates use
of high quality,
credible and
relevant resources
to support and
develop ideas.
There are no
mistakes in the
APA style.
Demonstrates use of good
quality, credible and
relevant resources to
support and develop
arguments and
statements. Shows
evidence of wide scope
within the organisation for
sourcing evidence
There are no mistakes in
the APA style.
Demonstrates use of high
quality, credible and
relevant resources to
support and develop
arguments and position
statements. Shows
evidence of wide scope
within and without the
organisation for sourcing
evidence
There are no mistakes in
the APA style.
Effective
Communication
25%
Difficult to understand for
audience, no logical/clear
structure, poor flow of ideas,
argument lacks supporting
evidence.
Audience cannot follow the line of
reasoning.
Information,
arguments and
evidence are
presented in a way
that is not always
clear and logical.
Information,
arguments and
evidence are well
presented, mostly
clear flow of ideas
and arguments.
Line of reasoning is
easy to follow.
Information, arguments
and evidence are very well
presented; the
presentation is logical,
clear and well supported
by evidence.
Demonstrates cultural
sensitivity.
Expertly presented; the
presentation is logical,
persuasive, and well
supported by evidence,
demonstrating a clear flow
of ideas and arguments.
Engages and sustains
audience’s interest in the
Line of reasoning is
often difficult to
follow.
topic, demonstrates high
levels of cultural sensitivity
Effective use of diverse
presentation aids,
including graphics and
multi-media.
Knowledge and
understanding
25%
Limited understanding of required
concepts and knowledge
Key components of the assignment
are not addressed.
Knowledge or
understanding of
the field or
discipline.
Resembles a recall
or summary of key
ideas.
Often
conflates/confuses
assertion of
personal opinion
with information
substantiated by
evidence from the
research/course
materials.
Thorough
knowledge or
understanding of
the field or
discipline/s.
Supports personal
opinion and
information
substantiated by
evidence from the
research/course
materials.
Demonstrates a
capacity to explain
and apply relevant
concepts.
Highly developed
understanding of the field
or discipline/s.
Discriminates between
assertion of personal
opinion and information
substantiated by robust
evidence from the
research/course materials
and extended reading.
Well demonstrated
capacity to explain and
apply relevant concepts.
A sophisticated
understanding of the field
or discipline/s.
Systematically and
critically discriminates
between assertion of
personal opinion and
information substantiated
by robust evidence from
the research/course
materials and extended
reading.
Mastery of concepts and
application to new
situations/further learning.

READ ALSO...   Practice Data Analysis Tool
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER