Project Initiation, Planning and Execution SBM4302 IT Audit and Controls Workshop #7 statistical justification for rejection Con…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Assessment Information
Subject Code:
MBA642
Subject Name:
Project Initiation, Planning and Execution
Assessment Title:
Reflective Journal
Weighting:
30%
Total Marks:
30
Due Date:
Monday of Week 5, 11:55pm AEST
Assessment DescriptionSubmission: TurnitinLength: 2,000 words +/- 10%Late submission possible: KBS penalties will be appliedAssessment briefYou are required to identify three (3) situations where either a team member or a leader behavedin the following ways on a project you were working on:

The good: exemplary project management behavior was observedThe bad: poor project management behavior was observedThe ugly: unacceptable project management behavior was observed
Each case can be either something you were personally involved in or observed, or somethingyou read about. You can use team work in your MBA.For each ‘case’ you are required to write approx. 500 words for each scenario :1. A description of the context and the case2. A critical reflection on why you felt the case to be ‘good’, ‘bad’, or ‘ugly.3. Offer the lessons learnt for project management practiceThe critical reflection should draw on the resources and material covered in Week 1 and 2 ofthe course. Academic referencing to source material is required. Prepare your submission as areport; including an Introduction and a Conclusion (approx. 500 words in total).

Introduction: State the aims of the assessmentConclusion: Collating the lessons learnt, what have these cases taught you about projectwork?
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material inthis communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protectionunder the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is aregistered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426BImportant Study InformationAcademic Integrity PolicyKBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating,plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.For details on academic integrity policies and penalties, the reassessment process, and the appealsprocess, please refer to http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.Word Limits for Written AssessmentsSubmissions that exceed the word count by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limitis exceeded.Study AssistanceStudents may seek study assistance from their local Academic Success Centre representative or refer to the studyhelp on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. You can find this by clicking on the top page toolbar:My Services>Academic Success Centre>Study Support ResourcesCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material inthis communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protectionunder the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is aregistered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any furtherreproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.Assessment Marking Rubric
Criteria
F (Fail)0%-49%
P (Pass)50%-64%
CR (Credit) 65%-74%
D (Distinction)75% – 84%
HD (High Distinction)85%-100%
Reflective Thinking
The reflection does not addressthe student’s thinking and/orlearning.
The reflection attempts todemonstrate thinking aboutlearning but is vague and/orunclear about the personallearning process.
The reflection captures many of thekey learning issues and capturessome of the influenceson personal learning.
The reflection explains thestudent’s thinking abouthis/her own learningprocesses.
The reflection explains thestudent’s own thinking andlearning processes, as well asimplications for future learning.
Analysis
The reflection does notmove beyond a descriptionof the learning experience.
The reflection attempts toanalyze the learningexperience but the value ofthe learning to the studentor others is vague and/orunclear.
The reflection analyses many of thelearning episodes and makes severalconnections to how the learning can beapplied to self or others
The reflection is an analysis ofthe learning experience and thevalue of the derived learning toself or others.
The reflection is an in- depth analysisof the learning experience, the valueof the derived learning to self orothers, and the enhancement of thestudent’s appreciation for thediscipline.
Conclusion integratesthe cases and makesconnections withprevious experience andcourse learning.
The conclusion does notintegrate the cases orarticulate any connection toother learning orexperiences.
The conclusion attempts tointegrate the cases andarticulate connectionsbetween this learningexperience and contentfrom other courses, pastlearning experiences, orpersonal goals, but theconnection is vague and/orunclear.
The conclusion adequately integrates thecases and provides some connections fromthis course to previous learning andexperience
The conclusion integrates thecases and articulatesconnections between thislearning experience and contentfrom other courses, past learningexperiences, and/or future goals.
The conclusion integrates the casesand articulates multiple connectionsbetween this learning experience andcontent from other courses, pastlearning, life experiences and/or futuregoals.
Report clearly and logicallypresented.Appropriate theory andresearch used to answerquestion posed.
Lacks logical flow and structure;Argument supported by theorysourced from non-academicliterature. No discussion ofacademic research. Cites veryfew sources.
Some errors in logical flow andstructure; Argument supported bybasic discussion of relevanttheory sourced from a minimalnumber of academic sources.Little if any discussion of relevantresearch.
Generally sound logical flow and structure;Argumentsupported by broad discussion of relevanttheory sourced from academic literature.Relevant research acknowledged but notdiscussed. Cites several academic sources.
Very good logical flow and structure;Argument supported by detaileddiscussion of relevant theory andresearch sourced from numerousacademic sources.
Excellent logical flow and structure;Argument supported by comprehensivediscussion ofrelevant theory and research sourcedfrom numerous quality academicsources.
Correct academic writing styleused, including correct spelling,grammar and punctuation.
Writing style is unclear; lackslogical flow and structure;numerous spelling grammaticalerrors.
Writing style lacks some clarity;some flaws in logical flow andstructure; some use of disciplinespecific academic language.Several spelling or grammaticalerrors.
Writing style is mostly clear; Mostly written indiscipline specific academic language; Somespelling or grammatical errors.
Writing style is clear; Correct use ofdiscipline specific academiclanguage. Some minor spelling orgrammatical errors.
Writing style is clear; Fluent use ofdiscipline specific academic language.No spelling or grammatical errors.
Format of answer consistentwith question requirements andKBS guidelines. Word count iswithin + / – 10% of requirement.
Does not comply with KBSguidelines. Major layout errors.Breaches word limit restrictions.
Mostly compliant with KBSguidelines. Basicformatting with somelayout errors. Compliantwith word limitrestrictions.
Complies with KBS guidelines. Formatgenerally sound. Compliant with word limitrestrictions.
Exceeds basic compliancewith KBS guidelines. Formatportrays information well. Compliantwith word limit restrictions.
Exceeds basic compliance withKBS guidelines. Format presentsinformation clearly and concisely.Compliant with word limit restrictions.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any furtherreproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
In-text referencing andreference list follows Harvardstyle and consistent with KBSguidelines.
Several sources areunacknowledged. Major errorsin format of references.
Acknowledged most sources inthe text and reference list. Somereferences in the correct format.
Acknowledged most sourcesin the text and reference list. Most referencesin the correct format.
Acknowledged all sources inthe text and in reference list.All references in correct format.
Acknowledged all sources in thetext and in reference list. All references inthe correct format.
Comments:

READ ALSO...   all citations used in the body of your paper
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER