PG Assessment and Grading Criteria for HBS increasing football participation

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

PG Assessment and Grading Criteria for HBS (Learning Conversation/ Viva/ Interview – with PERSONAL REFLECTION/ LOG)
Module Code: _______________ Lecturer: ________________________________ Student ID number: ________________________________________
PG
Communication skills and structure
of the conversation
The Inquiry – Discover
Deepen – Breadth / Depth / Integration
of Literature
Do – Analysis /Critical evaluation/
Discussion of recommendations
Reflective Learning Log – An
individual PERSONAL review
Task details
lecturers to
amend to suit
Reflection, awareness of issues,
learning conversation to focus on
both the inquiry and reflection, if oral
e.g. 5 minutes for each student
Explore/ explain/understand your
business topic or your skills, e.g.
Assess your SWOT, or aspects of a
business to discover its issues & USP
Integration and application of
information to show insight, to include
a minimum of 10 sources
Line of argument, development of
discussion/analysis to include
recommendations for future action
Discussion, review and completion
of a personal log, to be used in the
indiv learning conversation
Check format. Log, Essay or Report
80-100
Outstanding
Outstanding… Exceptional
communication skills. Extremely
articulate and fluent; language is clear,
concise and appropriate without
grammatical errors.
Outstanding… exploration of business
and issue showing excellent knowledge
and understanding through thorough
and appropriate research.
Impressive choice and range of
appropriate content.
Outstanding… Business insight and
application.
Breadth, depth and integration of
extremely wide variety of vital
literature/data into work.
Outstanding… Level of
discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation.
Highly developed/ focused work with
original and realistic recommendations
for the future.
Outstanding…Level of thorough in
depth reflection undertaken and
extremely valuable insights into the
process of learning recorded. Clearly
linked relevant future action plan.
70-79
Excellent
Excellent… Extremely articulate and
fluent; language is clear, concise and
appropriate.
Only a couple of minor errors.
Excellent… Level of knowledge and
understanding of the business and issue
demonstrated.
Evidence of appropriate inquiry
Covers all relevant points and issues.
Excellent… Business insight and
application.
Breadth, depth and integration of very
wide variety of appropriate literature/data
into work.
Excellent… Level of
discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
clearly developing points in the
appropriate way with thorough
consideration of all possibilities.
Excellent… reflective narrative with
clear understanding of the process of
learning. Clearly linked relevant future
action plan.
60-69
Very Good
Very good… Fluent and clear
communication with very few
grammatical errors/ hesitations/
mistakes.
Very good… Level of knowledge and
understanding of the business and issue
demonstrated.
Covers most relevant points and issues.
Few errors / omissions in
content/calculations.
Very good… Business insight and
application. Breadth, depth and
integration of a wide variety of
literature/data into work.
Very good… Level of discussion/
analysis/ critical evaluation and
appropriate recommendations. Few
points need further development or
evaluation/comparison.
Very Good… reflective narrative,
showing a clear level of understanding
of the process of learning. Clearly
linked relevant future action plan.
55-59
Good
Good… Clear competent
communication with mainly logical
progression of thoughts but with some
grammatical errors/hesitations
/mistakes.
Good… grasp of the issue and some of
its implications presented.
Knowledge and understanding is
demonstrated. Minor errors / omissions
in content/ calculations.
Good… Business insight and application.
Some variety of breadth, depth and
integration of literature/data into work.
Good… Level of discussion/analysis/
critical evaluation and appropriate
recommendations but more ideas/points
could be addressed /developed further.
Good… Sound reflective narrative with
understanding of the process of
learning. A good level of reflection and
changes/actions planned.
50-54
Satisfactory
Satisfactory… Basic appropriate
communication skills in evidence but
not always clearly expressed – in terms
of correct grammar or use of words or
delivery.
Satisfactory… Basic content / level of
knowledge of the business and issue.
Addresses part of the task – some errors
/ omissions/ misconceptions in content/
calculations. May benefit from further
research.
Satisfactory… Business insight and
application.
Limited integration with literature/ data.
Use of literature/data but limited in
breadth OR depth.
Satisfactory… Basic evidence of
discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation
and some recommendations. More
development and comment needed on
superficial points.
Satisfactory… Simple record of
content with some basic reflection.
Some evidence of understanding of
the process of learning having taken
place and actions planned.
40-49
Marginal Fail
Weak… Poor communication skills with
a number of errors, hesitations and / or
poor exchange of ideas.
Must see CASE
Weak… Limited content / knowledge/
calculations. Limited or muddled
understanding of the topic/question.
Does not meet all the learning
outcomes.
Weak… Unsatisfactory evidence of
business application and insight.
Work needs to show better links between
practical application and theory.
Weak… Limited evidence of
discussion/analysis/critical evaluation
and/or recommendations. Development
and comment needed rather than
description.
Must see CASE
Weak… Poor record of content or a
simple diary with insufficient reflection
or action planning.
20 – 39
Clear Fail
Inadequate… communication skills.
Very poor use of language, little fluency
or logical progression of thought.
Rambling speaking style.
Must see CASE
Inadequate… Lacking in relevant
content/ knowledge/calculations.
Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not
meet all the learning outcomes.
Inadequate… Lacks evidence of
business application and insight. Some
literature irrelevant to topic.
Inadequate… Lacking / inadequate level
of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation
and recommendations. Too anecdotal or
descriptive.
Must see CASE
Inadequate… or incomplete reflective
work, or a descriptive diary without
reflection on learning and/or action
planning.
1 – 19
Little or
Nothing of
merit
Nothing of merit… Unsatisfactory
incomprehensible incomplete or
inappropriate communication.
Must see CASE
Nothing of merit… Unsatisfactory level
of knowledge demonstrated.
Content irrelevant / not appropriate to
the topic. Does not meet the learning
outcomes.
Nothing of merit… No evidence of
appropriate business application and
insight.
Nothing of merit… No evidence of
appropriate discussion/analysis/ critical
evaluation and/or recommendations.
Must see CASE
Nothing of merit… Little or no attempt
to submit appropriate written work with
reflection. Does not meet learning
outcomes.
Penalty:
Moderator:
Total Mark Awarded:

READ ALSO...   successful sporting team
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER