Operations Management and Decision-Making Models CommunicationsWorkshop 1 Theories of Counselling BUS700 ECONOMICS (PG) BUS708 S…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Assessment InformationCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Anyfurther reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business SchoolPty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.Assessment 1 Information
Subject Code:
MBA503
Subject Name:
Operations Management and Decision-Making Models
Assessment Title:
Operational Strategy
Assessment Type:Length:
Individual report1500 words (+/- 10% allowable range)
Weighting:
30%
Total Marks:Submission:
100Online
Due Date:
Week 5
Your taskUsing the most recent year’s gold award winners of the Australasian Reporting Awards –Sustainability section, you are required to prepare a 1500-word report explaining how your chosencompany’s operational strategies, supply and logistics systems and strategic decisions have supportedthe company to achieve its desired business outcomes.Assessment Description.In this individual assessment, students will be given an opportunity to explain operational strategies anddemonstrate the skills needed to build effective supply and logistics systems that support desiredbusiness outcomes by applying strategies integrating ethical, social and global considerations, whichwill benefit organisational performance.Assessment InstructionsThe Australasian Reporting Awards celebrate and acknowledge excellence in preparing annual reports.The awards are held annually, with companies from Australia, New Zealand and the Asia Pacific areabeing eligible to apply. The company chosen by students must have won a gold award in thesustainability section of the awards in the most recent year. The link to the relevant section of the awardsis http://www.arawards.com.au/SustainabilityAwardsThe assessment needs to include the following headings:1. INTRODUCTION – (150 words) – Provide an overview of the company.2. REPORT – Address the following questions under each of the headings:✓ Supply Chain – How has the company built an effective supply chain and/or logistics systemwhich supports the company’s operational and sustainability processes. (300 words)✓ Economic, environmental and social impacts – What are the critical factors (ethical, socialor global) impacting the company in relation to sustainability and organisational performance.(450 words)✓ Operational/ management approaches – What are the key operational/management mattersthe company has needed to address in the year covered by the report. (450 words)3. CONCLUSION (150 words).Assessment InformationCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Anyfurther reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business SchoolPty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.4. REFERENCE LIST (following Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style)• The primary source of information with this assessment is the chosen company’s annual report.This information needs to be augmented by a minimum of 10 academic references.• Please refer to the assessment marking guide to assist you in completing all the assessmentcriteria.Assessment SubmissionThis file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ file to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrectfile format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. MyKBSwill notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your workshopfacilitator via email and provide a brief description of the problem and a screenshot of the MyKBS errormessage. You are also encouraged to submit your work well before the deadline to avoid any possibledelay involving the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties.Late assignment submission penaltiesPenalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School“late assignment submission penalties” policy.
Number ofdays
Penalty
1* – 9 days
5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the totalmarks available
10 – 14 days
50% deducted from the total marks available.
After 14 days
Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days afterthe due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive amark of zero for the assignment(s).
Note
Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also begiven a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments havebeen returned to students
*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to beone day late and therefore subject to the associated penaltyFor more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policiesAssessment InformationCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Anyfurther reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business SchoolPty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.Important Study InformationAcademic Integrity PolicyKBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences ofcheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.What is academic integrity and misconduct?What are the penalties for academic misconduct?What are the late penalties?How can I appeal my grade?Click here for answers to these questions:https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policiesWord Limits for Written AssessmentsSubmissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point atwhich that limit is exceeded.Study AssistanceStudents may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to theresources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subjectof copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.MBA503 Assessment 1 Marking Rubric – Operational Strategy Report 30%
MarkingCriteria (__/100)
F (Fail)0 – 49%
P (Pass)50 – 64%
C (Credit)65 – 74%
D (Distinction)75 – 84%
HD (High Distinction)85 -100%
Introduction andconclusion__/10 marks
Either the introduction and/orthe conclusion is missing. Ifpresent poorly written, withgrammatical and spellingerrors detracting from what iswritten.
Your introduction and conclusionare present but not well written,vague and unstructured. Someeffort at indicating what will becovered in the paper included butnot clear. The conclusion, alsopresent but vague and reiteratespoints made in the paper, withouthighlighting key points
Your intro is effectively written. Itprovides an overview of thedirection of the paper but is notcompelling. The reader has anidea of what to expect. Theconclusion recaps the main points,summarising the central andsignificant points.
Your intro is engagingly written. Itprovides an overview of the directionof the paper and gives the reader anidea of what to expect withoutengaging. The conclusion recaps themain points, summarising the centraland significant points. Both couldhave more impact on the reader
Your intro is compellingly andengagingly written. Provides aprecise and succinct, overview ofthe direction of the paper –engaging the reader. Theconclusion recaps the critical points,summarising the central andsignificant points.
Supply Chain__/20 marks
Your analysis of the supplychain is poorly written. Errorsin the writing make the reporthard to understand. Few, ifany, connections madebetween the supply chain andoperations of the organisation.
Your analysis of the supply chainis developing, but grammatical andspelling errors detract from thedocument. Vague connectionssupply chain /logistics and impacton the operational practice of thecompany. A basic understandingof the concepts communicated butnot developed
Your analysis of the supply chainis adequate. Connectionsapparent between supply chain/logistics and impact on theoperational and sustainabilitypractice of the company.Comments and observations areindicating an understanding of theconcepts.
Your analysis of the supply chain issufficient and detailed connectionsmade between supply chain/logistics and impact on theoperational and sustainabilitypractice of the company. Someinsightful comments made indicatinga notable understanding of theconcepts.
Your analysis of the supply chain isconvincing, credible and compellingconnections made between supplychain /logistics and impact on theoperational and sustainabilitypractice of the company—insightful,discerning and perceptivecomments, indicatingcomprehensive understanding.
Economicenvironmental andsocial impacts__/25 marks
Key areas inadequatelycovered. Understanding of thecritical factors not clear.Underdeveloped or nonexistent development of thelinkages.
Some of the key areas covered –others missed. Some explanationof critical factors but could bemore convincingly developed.Grammar and/or spelling errorsare detracting from thedevelopment of the ideas.
Some discussion re the economic,environmental and social impacts.Linkages with operational andsustainability evident, but explicitlyexplained—good understanding ofthe critical factors evident – butunder-developed. Position evidentbut not strongly presented.
Your discussion provides a clearposition regarding the economic,environmental, and social impacts ofthe company. Critical factors wellexplained some insightfulcommentary included. Advancedconceptual understanding evident.Some commentary could be betterdeveloped.
Your discussion around impacts isdetailed, considered, and welldeveloped position re the impacts ofeconomic, environmental and socialimpacts on the company –performance and sustainability.Astute commentary included recritical factors. Advancedconceptual understanding evident.
Operational/managementapproaches__/25 marks
Limited explanation of the keyoperational / managementissues. Lists issues but little orno development.
Your explanation is basic, but notdeveloped of key concepts.Limited development of linkagesbetween company context andoperational / managementconcepts. Issues with writtenEnglish impacting the flow of thereport
Your explanation covers keyconcepts. Understanding theimpacts on operational /management matters explainedclearly. Concepts could be betterdeveloped.
Your explanation is in-depthcoverage of the key operational /management matters of thecompany. Explanation of the impactdemonstrated a full and detailedunderstanding of central issues.
Your explanation is comprehensiveand in-depth, covering the keyoperational / management mattersof the company. Explanation of theimpact demonstrated a full anddetailed understanding of centralissues.
Use ofsources/supportiveevidence__/10 marks
Your research lacks focusand/or you have chosenunsuitable or bogus sources,which do not link to therequired assessment task.
You have demonstrated a basiclevel of research, supported by areasonable selection of primaryand/or secondary sources.
You have demonstratedsubstantial research, supported bya reasonable selection of primaryand secondary sources.
You have demonstrated substantialresearch supported by anappropriate selection and range ofprimary and secondary sources.
You have demonstrated extensiveresearch supported by anappropriate selection and range ofprimary and secondary sources.
In-text citations andreferencing__/10 marks
Neither in-text referencing norreference list adheres toKaplan Harvard ReferencingStyle.
In-text referencing or the resultantreference list adheres to KaplanHarvard Referencing Style, withsome errors.
Both in-text referencing and theresultant reference list adhere toKaplan Harvard Referencing Style,with some errors.
Both in-text referencing and theresultant reference list adhere toKaplan Harvard Referencing Style,with only occasional minor errors.
Both in-text referencing and theresultant reference list adherestrictly to Kaplan HarvardReferencing Style, with no errors.
Feedback and grades will be released via MyKBS

READ ALSO...   High Quality Essay Writing Service Online
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER