MSc Management with Streams PHC208 Primary Health Care in the Community Practical Scientific Procedures & Techniques Data Driven…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

BPP Coursework Cover Sheet
Please use the table below as your cover sheet for the 1st page of the submission. The sheet should be
before the cover/title page of your submission.
Programme
MSc Management with Streams
Module name
Knowledge Management and Information Systems
Schedule Term
Student Reference Number (SRN)
Report/Assignment Title
Date of Submission
(Please attach the confirmation of any
extension received)
Declaration of Original Work:
I hereby declare that I have read and understood BPP’s regulations on plagiarism and that this is my
original work, researched, undertaken, completed and submitted in accordance with the requirements
of BPP Business School.
The word count, excluding contents table, bibliography and appendices, is ______ words.
Student Reference Number: Date:
By submitting this coursework, you agree to all rules and regulations of BPP regarding
assessments and awards for programmes. Please note, submission is your declaration you are fit
to sit.
BPP University reserves the right to use all submitted work for educational purposes and may
request that work be published for a wider audience.
BPP School of Business and Technology
MSc Management with Streams
Knowledge Management and Information
Systems
Coursework Assessment Brief
Submission mode: Turnitin online access
1. General Assessment Guidance
 Your summative assessment for this module is made up of this coursework submission which
accounts for 100% of the marks
 Please note late submissions will not be marked.
 You are required to submit all elements of your assessment via Turnitin online access. Only
submissions made via the specified mode will be accepted and hard copies or any other digital
form of submissions (like via email or pen drive etc.) will not be accepted.
 For coursework, the submission word limit is 3500 words. You must comply with the word count
guidelines. You may submit LESS than 3500 words but not more. Word Count guidelines can be
found on your programme home page and the coursework submission page.
 Do not put your name or contact details anywhere on your submission. You should only put your
student registration number (SRN) which will ensure your submission is recognised in the marking
process.
 A total of 100 marks are available for this module assessment, and you are required to achieve
minimum 50% to pass this module.
 You are required to use only Harvard Referencing System in your submission. Any content which is
already published by other author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of
plagiarism.
You can find further information on Harvard Referencing in the online library on the VLE. You can
use the following link to access this information: http://bpp.libguides.com/Home/StudySupport
 BPP University has a strict policy regarding authenticity of assessments. In proven instances of
plagiarism or collusion, severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to read
the rules and regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion in the GARs and MOPP which are
available on VLE in the Academic registry section.
 You should include a completed copy of the Assignment Cover sheet. Any submission without this
completed Assignment Cover sheet may be considered invalid and not marked.
2. Assessment Brief
The summative assessment of Knowledge Management and Information Systems module is a
coursework submission as a written report. You are required to use only peer reviewed published
academic/professional articles, books, business/industry reports to support your discussions.
The “Module Resources” section of the VLE provides you with guides and tutorials on finding/using
available peer-reviewed resources via Open Athens account.
2.1 Assessment Questions
Your organisation is looking to upgrade its IT infrastructure and is considering a range of Knowledge
Management Information Systems (KMIS) to be integrated with any other appropriate system.
1. Select an organisation of your choice. For this organisation, define:
 Corporate Objectives
 Business Overview
 Corporate Structure
 Outline the business model of the organisation
(10 Marks)
2. Critically evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and challenges of your chosen
organisation (using about 3 models) taking into consideration all environmental factors
including competitors
(25 Marks)
3. Recommend the most appropriate knowledge management information system(s) for your
chosen organisation. Justify your recommendations specifically how it would improve the
performance of the business both currently and potentially in the future; and how it would
help the business achieve its corporate objectives.
(40 Marks)
4. Critically assess three key management implementation challenges the organisation may face
while implementing your recommendations
(15 Marks)
5. You should include a short introduction, which gives a general overview and organisation of
the report
(5 Marks)
6. Structure, referencing, use of language including use of Harvard Referencing System
(5 Marks)
Total 100 Marks
2.2 Submission Structure
Your report should be structured according to the followings:
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Main sections
You need to create relevant headings. Don’t copy and paste the questions as headings.
All the sections except references must be numbered. All the figures/tables used in
the report must have captions (e.g. Figure 1, Table 1), properly referenced and
explained in the report otherwise they will not be marked.
Appendixes (if needed)
References
2.3 Marking Guide
Assessment Part
Mark
Approach & Marking Criteria
1. Introduction
5
Provide an introduction, which gives a general overview and
organisation of the report and specific report objectives.
Avoid using citations in this section. A suggestion of no more
than 200 words. Although this is the first item to appear in
your report, we recommend that you leave this as the last
thing you write in the development of your work.
2. Select an organisation of
your choice. For this
organisation, define:
 Corporate Objectives
 Business Overview
 Corporate Structure
 Outline the business model
of the organisation
10
(i) Select any organisation of your choice
(ii) Give a brief overview of the organisation
(iii) Outline the corporate objectives
(iv) Show the corporate structure. It doesn’t have to be too
detailed
(v) Outline the business model
3.Critically evaluate the
strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and challenges
of your chosen organisation
taking into consideration all
environmental factors
including competitors
25
a) The environmental factors which affect the
company in terms of political, economic, social,
ecological, technological factors including the
challenges in the industry.
b) Strengths and Weakness, Threats and
Opportunities to the organization.
An excellent performance will draw on examples from
practice that illustrates issues, concepts, theories with at
least 3 different models
4.Recommend the most
appropriate management
information systems for your
chosen organisation. Justify
your recommendations
specifically how it would
improve the performance of
the business both currently
and potentially in the future;
and how it would help the
40
a) Information system(s) to support the major
business functions of the organization and
strategize its operations giving it the required
competitive edge. Recommend IS to give a
competitive edge to the organization. The
information systems need to be specific to the
organisation (15 marks).
b) How information system(s) can be used to
facilitate Knowledge capture & sharing, Customer
relations management/ Supply chain
management aspects of the organization (20
marks).
c) Set out the performance objectives of the
business (5 marks)
business achieve its corporate
objectives
5. Critically assess three key
management implementation
challenges the organisation
may face while implementing
your recommendations
15
For this question you need to ensure you have clearly
structured your answers to ensure you have discussed three
implementation challenges. Your discussions on these points
should include:
It is strongly suggested that journal articles and case studies,
published over the last ten years, from sources such as Athens
and Google Scholar that provide examples from business and
academia, should support your discussion.
An excellent performance will match information systems to
specific issues raised
Submission Structure,
Referencing and Language
5
Students should follow instructions in section 2.2 Submission
Structure and General Assessment Guidance of this
document.
Students should clearly structure their paper, using report
style titles, subtitles, numbered sections and subsections.
All sections except references must be numbered. All the
figures/tables used in the report must have captions and,
wherever needed, properly referenced and mentioned in the
report. The figures/tables which are not mentioned in the
report will not be marked. Students should use Harvard
referencing and the language should be appropriate to the
academic context and business communication.
Avoid personal language:
Academic writing is impersonal. You should not use words like
I, my, me, myself etc. There are three main ways of doing this:
 use a passive rather than an active verb
 use an impersonal phrase such as ‘it is believed’
 make words such as ‘the essay’, ‘this section’ etc. the
subject of the sentence
Total
100
Appendix A – General Grading Criteria (Level 7)
Criteria
Grades
Distinction
70-+%
Merit
60-69%
Pass
50-59%
Fail
40-49%
Fail
0-39%
The work displays:
The work displays:
The work displays:
The work displays:
The work displays:
Knowledge &
Understanding
(a) Systematic
Understanding
(b) Emerging
Thought
(a) Clear evidence of a
comprehensive and
systematic understanding
of a considerable variety
of issues, concepts,
theories and research
(a) Clear evidence of a
comprehensive and
systematic understanding
of all major – and some
minor – issues, concepts,
theories and research
(a) Evidence of a
systematic understanding,
which may contain some
gaps, of all major – and
some minor – issues,
concepts, theories and
research
(a) Evidence of an
understanding of an
appropriate range of issues,
concepts, theories and research
but has significant gaps or
misunderstandings.
(a) Evidence of a limited
understanding of issues,
concepts, theories and
research either major
and/or minor.
(b) Precise and well
judged application of
thoughts and practices at
the forefront of the
discipline
(b) Some clear evidence
of the application of
thoughts and practices at
the forefront of the
discipline
(b) Clear evidence of an
understanding of thoughts
and practices at the
forefront of the discipline.
(b) Unclear or imprecise
understanding of thoughts and
practices at the forefront of the
discipline.
(b) Significant gaps in
the understanding of
the debates at the
forefront of the
discipline.
Argument
(a) Analysis,
Synthesis &
Evaluation
(b) Numerical
Analysis
(a) Consistently precise,
accurate and reasoned
analysis, synthesis and/or
evaluation addressing all
issues, some with
creativity
(a) Precision, accuracy
and clear reasoning
throughout the analysis,
synthesis and/or
evaluation addressing all
issues appropriately
(a) Broad levels of
precision, accuracy and
reasoning in analysis,
synthesis and/or
evaluation, and addresses
all key issues
(a) Errors which affect the
consistency of the analysis,
synthesis or evaluation and/or
key gaps in the issues addressed
(a) A lack of precision,
accuracy or reasoning in
analysis, synthesis or
evaluation with
significant gaps in the
issues addressed
(b) Numeric analysis that
is complete and mostly
free from errors with
fluent and appropriate
(b) Numeric analysis that
is complete and mostly
free from errors with
relevant and effective
(b) Numeric analysis that is
mostly complete and free
from significant or critical
errors with appropriate
(b) Numeric analysis that is
mostly complete but contains
errors with significant effect, or
methods that are applied
(b) Numeric analysis
that is incomplete or
contains errors which
have critical effect, or
Criteria
Grades
Distinction
70-+%
Merit
60-69%
Pass
50-59%
Fail
40-49%
Fail
0-39%
The work displays:
The work displays:
The work displays:
The work displays:
The work displays:
(c)
Argumentation
(d) Independent
Research
application of methods.
application of methods.
application of methods.
inappropriately
methods that are
applied inappropriately
(c) Extremely strong and
consistent argument that
convincingly addresses
issues including
uncertainties and
conflicts. Excellent use of
information gathered
which to support and
further the argument
(c) Evidence of an
argument that is
generally convincing with
a good internal
consistency and
addresses most issues.
Very good use of
information gathered to
support the argument.
(c) Evidence of an overall
convincing argument but
may have weaknesses,
gaps or inconsistencies.
Clear use of information
gathered but may have
some weaknesses in the
integration into the
argument.
(c) Evidence of a consistent
argument but may have
weaknesses, significant gaps or
be unconvincing. Clear use of
information gathered but may
not be sufficient to sustain the
argument.
(c) Lack of consistency
or structure in the
argument. Serious
weaknesses in the
integration of evidence
and/or no awareness of
the limitations or
weaknesses of the
research.

READ ALSO...   Early Childhood Education and Care reasonably high level of profitability
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER