IAB401 Assignment Enterprise ArchitectureAssignment Abstract is excellent the Perspective of Energy Saving BIS2001 IT Infrastruc…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

IAB401 Assignment Part A-Assessment Criteria
Capability Map and Value Stream (40%)
Capability Map Criteria
Criterion
%
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Completeness in capturing all
capabilities and their layering (Service
Delivery management and Customer
Management)
20
Identification and
levelling of service
delivery
management
capabilities are
covered at an
excellent level (85-
100% of capabilities
are identified and
positioned correctly).
Identification and
levelling of service
delivery management
capabilities are covered
at a very good level (75-
84% of the capabilities
are identified and
positioned correctly).
Identification and
levelling of service
delivery management
capabilities are
covered at a good
level (65-74% of the
capabilities are
identified and
positioned correctly).
The description
and levelling of
service delivery
management
capabilities are
covered at an
adequate level
(50-64% of the
capabilities are
identified and
positioned
correctly).
Identification
and levelling of
service delivery
management
capabilities are
covered at a
moderately
inadequate (35-
49% of the
capabilities are
identified and
positioned
correctly).
The description
and levelling of
service delivery
management
capabilities are
covered at an
inadequate
level (15-34% of
the capabilities
are identified
and positioned
correctly).
The description
and levelling of
service delivery
management
capabilities are
covered at an
inadequate and
poor level (less
than 15%).
Comprehensibility in definitions of the
capabilities (being abstract, not using
technical terms, not redundant, not
biased) without overlaps and
dependencies.
10
85-100 of the
capabilities’ names
and their definitions
are meaningful and
comprehensible;
there exist no
overlap in definitions
and identification of
the capabilities
75-84% of the
capabilities’ names and
their definitions are
meaningful and
comprehensible; there
exist no overlap in
definitions and
identification of the
capabilities
65-74% of the
capabilities’ names
and their definitions
are meaningful and
comprehensible;
there is one overlap
in definitions and
identification of the
capabilities
50-64% of the
capabilities’
names and their
definitions are
meaningful and
comprehensible;
there are few
overlaps in
definitions and
identification of
the capabilities
35-49% of the
capabilities’
names and
their definitions
are meaningful
and
comprehensible
; there are
overlaps in
definitions and
identification of
the capabilities
15-34% of the
capabilities’
names and
their definitions
are meaningful
and
comprehensible
; there are
overlaps in
definitions and
identification of
the capabilities
Less than 15% of
the capabilities’
names and their
definitions are
meaningful and
comprehensible;
there are
overlaps in
definitions and
identification of
the capabilities
Value Stream
Criterion
%
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Value stream stages have been captured
in the right level of abstraction. (for both
Customer Management and Service
Delivery)
10
Identifying and
defining all stages in
the value stream
clearly (100%)
Identifying and defining
85% of the stages in the
value stream.
Identifying and
defining 75% of the
stages in the value
stream.
Identifying and
defining 62% of
the stages in the
value stream.
Identifying and
defining 50% of
the stages in
the value
stream.
Identifying and
defining 37% of
the stages in
the value
stream.
Less than37%
ArchiMate Model
Criterion
%
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
ArchiMate Model (overall weigh 60%)
Coverage of the key service delivery
areas described in the assignment brief
in a way that provides scoping and
comprehension of Centrelink’s service
delivery management capability.
10
Key service delivery
areas are identified
and grouped to an
excellent level (85-
100% coverage of all
the areas).
Key service delivery
areas are identified and
grouped to a very good
level (75-84% coverage
of all the areas).
Key service delivery
areas are identified
and grouped to a
good level (62-74%
coverage of all the
areas).
Key service
delivery areas
are identified
and grouped to
an adequate
level (50-61% of
all the areas).
Key service
delivery areas
are identified
and grouped to
a moderately
inadequate
level (35-49%
coverage of all
the areas).
Key service
delivery areas
are identified
and grouped to
an inadequate
level (15-34%
coverage of all
the areas).
Key service
delivery areas are
identified and
grouped to an
inadequate and
poor level (less
than 15%
coverage of all
the areas).
Model representation in the layered EA
modelling method, ArchiMate, of
Centrelink’s service delivery
management capability. The model
should provide scoping and
comprehensibility in terms of a layered
EA of this capability. All required
ArchiMate modelling elements from the
assignment brief should be covered:
business services, business roles,
business interfaces, application
components and application services.
The modelling elements should be
captured in the right layers and have the
required relationships with each other,
to provide an understanding of the
processing details involved. The
modelling elements across the layers
should be properly linked. The layers to
be covered are business and application
layers. The IT infrastructure is not
required for modelling.
40
Modelling elements
of the ArchiMate
model are captured,
syntactically correct,
related, layered and
aligned to an
excellent level (85-
100% coverage of
the elements related
to the main areas).
Modelling elements of
the ArchiMate model
are captured,
syntactically correct,
related, layered and
aligned to a very good
level with minor errors
(75-84% coverage of
the elements related to
the main areas).
Modelling elements
of the ArchiMate
model are captured,
syntactically correct,
related, layered and
aligned to a good
level with few errors
in some cases (62-
74% coverage of the
elements related to
the main areas).
Modelling
elements of the
ArchiMate
model are
captured,
syntactically
correct, related,
layered and
aligned to an
adequate level
(50-61%
coverage of the
elements
related to the
main areas).
Modelling
elements of the
ArchiMate
model are
captured,
syntactically
correct, related,
layered and
aligned to a
moderately
inadequate
level (35-49%
coverage of the
elements
related to the
main areas).
Modelling
elements of the
ArchiMate
model are
captured,
syntactically
correct, related,
layered and
aligned to an
inadequate
level (15-34%
coverage of the
elements
related to the
main areas).
Modelling
elements of the
ArchiMate model
are captured,
syntactically
correct, related,
layered and
aligned to an
inadequate and
poor level (less
than 15%
coverage of the
elements related
to the main
areas).
Demonstration of analysis through a
scenario description providing a flow
narrative of layered EA model provided
(textual description). In addition,
assumptions made in the analysis should
be listed. The scenario and assumptions
should be relevant to the layered EA
model, the capabilities and value stream
provided.
10
The descriptions of
scenario and
assumptions are
sufficiently
comprehensible,
logical and relevant
to the coverage of
value stream and the
elements of the
ArchiMate model
provided and also –
to an excellent level
(85-100% coverage
of the main areas).
The descriptions of
scenarios and
assumptions are
sufficiently
comprehensible and
relevant to the
coverage of value
stream and the
elements of the
ArchiMate model
provided – to a very
good level with some
minor errors (75-84%
coverage of the main
areas).
The descriptions of
scenarios and
assumptions are
sufficiently
comprehensible and
relevant to the
coverage of value
stream and
ArchiMate model
provided – to a good
level with few
inconsistencies (62-
74%).
The descriptions
of scenarios and
assumptions are
sufficiently
comprehensible
and relevant to
the coverage of
value stream
and ArchiMate
model provided
– to an adequate
level with some
inconsistencies
and errors (50-
61%).
The
descriptions of
scenarios and
assumptions
are sufficiently
comprehensible
and relevant to
the coverage of
value stream
and ArchiMate
model provided
– to a
moderately
inadequate
level (35-49%).
The
descriptions of
scenarios and
assumptions
are sufficiently
comprehensible
and relevant to
the coverage of
value stream
and ArchiMate
model provided
– to an
inadequate
level (15-34%).
The descriptions
of scenarios and
assumptions are
sufficiently
comprehensible
and relevant to
the coverage of
value stream and
ArchiMate model
provided – to an
inadequate and
poor level (less
than 15%).

READ ALSO...   Water Conflict Essay - No Plagiarism
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER