FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay
Marks and Feedback
Before 10am on:
20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7)
15 working days after deadline (L6)
10 working days after deadline (block delivery)
Unit title & code
Healthcare Commissioning PUB012-6
Assignment number and title
Number 2 Critical Appraisal
Critical Essay CW-OT
Weighting of assignment
Size or length of assessment
Unit learning outcomes
1. Demonstrate comprehensive knowledge and understanding of healthcare commissioning and its importance to UK and international public health 2. Demonstrate skills and abilities to critically evaluate/reflect on and apply the key theoretical and practical concepts in a healthcare commissioning scenario
What am I required to do in this assignment?
You will be randomly assigned two health care commissioning posters created by your peers for critical appraisal. You will gain access to your allocated posters on BREO.In the appraisal, you will need to critically evaluate ers demonstrating your understanding of health care commissioning and the key principles, concepts and frameworks in Health Care Commissioning. The appraisal should be 3,500 words in length, but a margin of 10% more or less than the word allowance is allowed for this assessment and therefore a length of 3150 – 3850 words will be acceptable.Your appraisal should be fully referenced using the Harvard system – refer to the University referencing guidelines for full details.
What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)
Demonstrate a coherent understanding of the meaning of healthcare commissioning and the processes involved in effective commissioning. Demonstrate the ability to evaluate the application of theoretical and practical concepts related to healthcare commissioning within a hypothetical healthcare commissioning scenario. Demonstrate the ability to produce a well-structured and coherent piece of written academic work supported by relevant literature and the ability to cite and reference literature.
How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?
Your written expression is clear and concise. Arguments are put forward succinctly and the structure of the piece is well-planned, well-thought out and logical, enhancing its readability. You have demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the meaning of healthcare commissioning and the concepts, and the processes involved in effective commissioning. You have used a broad range of primary literature sources to support the arguments presented in your critical appraisal and have clearly demonstrated the ability to cite and reference literature. You have demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the issues that the commissioning scenario is focused upon.
How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?
Each week the unit will cover content that will help you to plan for your assignment with opportunities for extended learning. The weekly unit content is designed to enable you to develop an understanding of the concepts and the process involved in healthcare commissioning in an incremental way, starting with an exploration of the meaning of the concept of healthcare commissioning and its importance in the UK and global public health followed by detailed discussions on various principles, concepts and frameworks used for effective health care commissioning. During the sessions, you will be encouraged to work in groups and to develop your critical thinking through both open discussions and small group based tasks.
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.
3rdClass – 40-49%
Lower 2nd– 50-59%
Upper 2nd– 60-69%
1stClass – 70%+
1. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND ACADEMIC WRTITING
Written expression is satisfactory and arguments can be followed without undue difficultySatisfactory level of academic writing with arguments supported by relevant evidence
Written expression is reasonably clear, but there are syntactical or proofing errors at places. Arguments can be followed easilyReasonably good level of academic writing with arguments well supported by evidence
Written expression is clear except for minor proofing errors. Arguments can be followed easilyFairly good level of academic writing with arguments well supported by evidence and examples
Excellent written expression and arguments are well constructed in a logical mannerExcellent level of academic writing with arguments well supported by good quality evidence and examples
2. PRESENTATION STRUCTURE AND FOCUS
The structure of the work is satisfactory but planning could have been more thorough at some placesFew key issues and concepts discussed in a satisfactory way
The structure of the work is reasonably good but planning could have been more thorough in a few placesSome of the key issues and concepts discussed in an adequate way
The structure of the work is fairly good with evidence of good planning throughout the textMost of the key issues and concepts are discussed systematically
Excellent structure that demonstrates thoughtful planningAll of the key issues and concepts are discussed systematically
3. KNOWLEDGE OF THE ISSUE, HEALTH CARE COMISSINING THEORY & PRACTICE
Satisfactory understanding of the issueSatisfactory understanding of some the key theoretical and practical commissioning concepts
A reasonably good understanding of the issueReasonably good understanding of the key theoretical and practical commissioning concepts
A fairly good understanding of the issueFairly good understanding of the key theoretical and practical commissioning concepts
Excellent understanding of the issueExcellent understanding of the key theoretical and practical commissioning concepts
4. USE OF LITERATURE AND REFERENCING
Satisfactory use of literature, but literature integration could be betterSatisfactory citation and referencing using the Harvard referencing style, but there is scope for significant improvement
Draws on a reasonably good range of literatureReasonably good citation and referencing using the Harvard referencing style, but there is scope for some improvement
Draws on a fairly good range of literatureFairly good citation and referencing using the Harvard referencing style, but there are minor errors at a few places
Draws on and applies a broad range of primary and secondary resourcesExcellent citation and referencing throughout the text using the Harvard referencing style
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER