Data Structure and Algorithms PROJ6000 Principles of Project Management MIS501 Principles of Programming BUS2003/SBM3204 Sustain…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 1 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
COURSE: Bachelor of IT
Unit Code:
Unit Title:
Data Structure and Algorithms
Type of Assessment:
Task 3- Individual Report
Word limit- 2000 words
Unit Learning Outcomes
a) Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of data structures and
b) Demonstrate reasoning about efficiency of algorithms;
c) Assess and apply suitable recursive data structures and algorithms to IT
systems and applications.
Submission Date:
To be submitted in week 11
Assessment Task:
The assessment is about a design of a system using OOP.
Total Mark:
20 Marks
Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally signed
approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – Assignment Extension
Application Form – Student Login Required) or previously approved application for other extenuating
circumstances impacting course of study, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day,
calculated by deduction from the total mark.
For example. An Assessment Task marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for each calendar day.
More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy &
Procedures – Student Login Required)
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 2 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
This assessment is an individual report about the design of an OOP system using Data Structures and
Algorithms. The report should follow the following structure using the actual case study that will be available
on Moodle (in assessment section) by week 8.
1. Title Page
2. Executive Summary
3. Introduction
4. Background
5. Case Study and the Design
5.1 Variables, Ranges and Keys
5.2 Operations and the Justification
5.3 Algorithms and the Justification
6. Conclusion
7. References
The assignment must be submitted online in Moodle. All materials MUST be submitted electronically in
Microsoft Word format. Other formats (e.g., pdf or MAC file) may not be readable by markers. Please be aware
that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented
in MS Word. No paper based or hardcopy submission will be accepted.
For assistance please speak to our Academic Learning Skills Coordinators, in Sydney ( or in
Melbourne ( They can help you with understanding the task, draft checking, structure,
referencing and other assignment-related matters
Marking Criteria
Lecturer Expectation
Choice of Variables, Keys and
The understanding of various
data types and importance of
choosing the right variables and
Justification of Variables, Keys and
Ranges choice
Specification of Operations
Identifying operations that are
required by the system to
function properly. The choice of
appropriate algorithm so that
data can be efficiently searched
and sorted.
Choice of Algorithms for every
Justification of Algorithms
Any modifications required
How making systems scalable
needs changes in the choice of
variables and algorithms so that
efficiency is not compromised
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 3 of 3 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.
Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and
demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student
must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you
refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System
(Moodle). For details please click the link
and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks
and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each
Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise
specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any
paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.
Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard
Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task
in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is
generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books,
chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not
the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own
research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text
references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before
preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism
through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link:
A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located
in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online
dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but
should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources.
Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as
government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC),
or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and
government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly
very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites
(Why can’t I just Google?):
(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).

READ ALSO...   Foundations of Nutrition and Health
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services