Criteria High Distinction

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory Evaluation of the two leadership styles to make changes to achieve the goals of improved communication and workplace culture and to introduce a ‘no blame’ culture in relation to patient safety. Exceptional, innovative, original, concise and clear evaluation of the two leadership styles in improving communication, workplace culture and introducing a no blamepatient safety culture. Very good, clear, and concise critical evaluation of the two leadership styles in improving communication, workplace culture and introducing a no blame patient safety culture. Good, clear and concise evaluation of the two leadership styles in improving communication, workplace culture and introducing a no blame patient safety culture. Satisfactory evaluation of how the two leadership styles in improving communication, workplace culture and introducing a no blame patient safety culture. Absent or inadequate evaluation of the two leadership styles in improving communication, workplace culture and introducing a no blame patient safety culture. /15 13-15 11.5-12.5 10-11 7.5-9 <7 Conclusion Outstanding, clear, concise, conclusion, which includes original pertinent insights; draws upon all significant points raised in the essay and draws these together in an expert manner. Provides a very good, clear, concise, organized conclusion, which succinctly and meaningfully summarizes all the main points raised in the essay and draws these together in a very good manner. Provides a good, clear, concise, organized conclusion, which summarizes most of the main points raised in the essay and draws these together in a good manner. Provides an adequate conclusion, with satisfactory reiteration of significant points in the essay. Meets the minimum requirements for a satisfactory conclusion. The conclusion is unclear or absent. The conclusion fails to satisfy the minimum requirements for a conclusion of an essay. /10 8.5-10 7.5-8 6.5-7 5-6 <4.5 Presentation Style, Academic writing Style and Length Outstanding, publishable level of writing style, and use of language evidenced. Very good layout. writing style and use of language. No errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation or writing style. Good layout and effective writing style and use of language. Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, sentence construction, paragraph construction or spelling. Satisfactory layout and effective writing style and use of language. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, sentence construction, paragraph construction or spelling. Poor presentation and layout noted .Poor writing style with errors in expression, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling and punctuation that impede meaning. /5 4.5-5 4 3.5 2.5-3 <2 Referencing Flawless referencing, with all references adequately and correctly given, both in text and in final reference list according to designated APA 7th Ed.. Adheres to word limit Very good referencing, with adequate and correct references given both in text and in final reference list according to designated APA 7th Ed.. Adheres to word !knit. Good referencing, with very few minor referencing style errors and following designated APA 7th Ed. conventions both in text and in final reference list, Adheres to word limit. Some minor referencing style errors, but generally satisfactory, following designated APA 7th Ed. conventions both in text and in final reference list. Adheres to word limit. Poor referencing in-text and/or in final reference list. Incorrect referencing style used. May fail to adhere to word limit. /5 4.5-5 4 3.5 2.5-3 <2 /100

READ ALSO...   Cold Wars and Hot Wars / Legacies
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER