BUS2003/SBM3204 Sustainability and Ethics International Finance fashion industry is at a decisive point variety of infectious di…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Assessment Brief: BUS2003/SBM3204 Sustainability and Ethics
Trimester-2 2021
Assessment Overview
Assessment Task
Type
Weight
Length
Due
ULOs
Assessed
Assessment 1: Debate & Report
Students will undertake a debate on a topic
provided by the lecturer
Group
Invigilated
30%
20
mins/1500
words
Week 5
ULO-1
ULO-2
ULO-3
ULO-5
Assessment 2: Case Study
Students will be given a case study which
will be provided by the lecturer
Individual
Invigilated
40%
2500
words
Week 7
ULO-1
ULO-2
ULO-3
ULO-4
Assessment 3: Viva Voce
A Viva Voce assessment is an oral
examination and verbal defence of a
written assessment. The written
assessment for the Viva Voce assessment is
based on Assessment 2: Case Study, which
was submitted in Week 7.
Individual
Invigilated
30%
15 mins
(equiv.
1500
words)
Week
10
ULO-1
ULO-2
ULO-3
ULO-5
equiv. – equivalent word count based on the Assessment Load Equivalence Guide. It means this assessment is
equivalent to the normally expected time requirement for a written submission containing the specified
number of words.
Assessment 1: Debate & Report
Due date:
Week 5
Group/individual:
Group, Marked Ind.
Word count/Time provided:
20 mins/1500 words
Weighting:
30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:
[ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO5]
Assessment 1 Detail
Student will be formed into groups of 4 students to conduct debates based on the topics provided by
Lecturer. After the debates, each group is required to write up a debate report based on one of
debate topics provided by the Lecturer. The assessment includes the following key components:
1. Introduction
2. Proposition 1 (support the resolution):
– Logical arguments for Proposition 1
– Gathered supporting evidence and examples for position taken
– Relevant theories learnt to support the arguments
3. Proposition 2 (against the resolution)
– Logical arguments for Proposition 2
– Gathered supporting evidence and examples for position taken
– Relevant theories learnt to support the argument
4. Conclusion
– Your final thoughts and opinions
The business report format is required for the individual assignment. The headings and subheadings
are strongly recommended to structure the business report. The Harvard Referencing Style is
required. For detailed requirement, please refer to the guidelines of how to write Business Report
and academic writing style. It is strongly recommended to review SLS learning Enhancement Section
in APIC Canvas. The link of Business Report Guideline was provided in the assessment section of this
subject in APIC Canvas.
Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric
The assessment will be marked out of 100% and will be weighted at 30% of the total unit mark. The
marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric
Marking Criteria
Not Satisfactory
(0-49% of the criterion
mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64% of the criterion
mark)
Good
(65-74% of the criterion
mark)
Very Good
(75-84% of the criterion
mark)
Excellent
(85-100% of the criterion
mark)
Ethical consideration
Demonstrate an
understanding of the
importance of ethical
considerations
(40%)
Inadequate understanding
of the importance of ethical
considerations.
Basic knowledge of the
importance of ethical
considerations.
Exhibits breadth and depth
of understanding of the
importance of ethical
considerations.
Exhibits accurate and
detailed breadth and depth
of understanding of the
importance of ethical
considerations.
Displays exceptional ability
in and understanding of the
importance of ethical
considerations..
Communication
Clear and convincing
communication
(40%)
Poorly articulated,
unconvincing argument.
Basic communication of
some facts in support of one
side of the argument.
Evidence of both presenting
an argument and refuting an
alternative position.
Above average use of
evidence to support a
position and refute the
alternative.
Sophisticated use of
evidence to support a
position and refute the
alternative.
Report presentation and
referencing
(20%)
Poor presentation report.
Poor writing skills with
grammar and spelling
errors. Fail to follow Harvard
referencing style.
Satisfactory presentation
format and writing skills
with some grammar and
spelling errors. Fail to follow
Harvard referencing style.
Good presentation format
and writing skills with
spelling errors. Follow
Harvard referencing style
Excellent presentation
format and writing skills
without spelling errors.
Follow Harvard referencing
style.
Distinguished presentation
format and writing skills.
Following Harvard
referencing style
completely.
Effective communication
during the debate
(20%)
Inadequate understanding
of the importance of ethical
considerations during the
debate.
Basic knowledge of the
importance of ethical
considerations during the
debate.
Exhibits breadth and depth
of understanding of the
importance of ethical
considerations during the
debate.
Exhibits accurate and
detailed breadth and depth
of understanding of the
importance of ethical
considerations during the
debate.
Displays exceptional ability
in and understanding of the
importance of ethical
considerations during the
debate.
Assessment 2: Case Study
Due date:
Week 7
Group/individual:
Individual
Word count/Time provided:
2500 words
Weighting:
40%
Unit Learning Outcomes:
[ULO1], [ULO2], [ULO3], [ULO4]
Assessment 2 Detail
In this case analysis, you need to identify an issue in business ethics and/or sustainability and demonstrate your
understanding of the discipline by evaluating your recommendations. You can investigate a real-life case from
an organisation. Your lecturer will not assign you to a case study. You must discuss your choice of case study
with your lecturer by providing a verbal or written rationale for choosing a particular case study. Your lecturer
needs to approve your choice of case study in written format (APIC email). Plagiarised assignments will not
be tolerated.
You need to consider a significant business ethics and/or sustainability issue. Do not consider multiple issues as
it will degrade the quality of work. You need to consider yourself being a consultant helping with the issue. Your
lecturer is looking for creative solutions proposed by groups.
Examples of issues could be:
• Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholders
• Managing ethical issues
• Ethical decision making
• The role of corporate culture and ethical decision making
• Ethics auditing
• Ethical leadership
Students will need to collect data from actual organisations and/or secondary sources. Valid sources for
obtaining such data may include:
• Visits to the case company and interviewing key personnel (if you choose to do this, interview questions
should be included in appendices).
• Secondary data from online (it should be reliable and valid online data sources such as data from other
research publications, databases and so on. (WIKIPEDIA is not a suitable one)
• Company’s annual/quarterly reports
• Related business strategy management articles and news.
Structure and format of the report (Assessment 2)
Introduction
The introduction should include background to the project and an introduce the topic you are researching, and
its importance followed by the case study objective and then the implications. More specifically- Introduction
section shall include what are you doing? Why (importance)? How (short methodology within 2-3 lines)? What
are the contributions (to managers, literature)?
Literature review
Review the literature on the topic you are researching. Review of journal articles is preferred. Please make
sure that your literature review reflects the understanding of business strategy management concepts for
the purpose of applying them and the application of theoretical concepts. More specifically you need to
write about the topic of your interest and relevant concepts based on previous studies. You need to
mention what previous studies have investigated? What previous studies were not investigated (Research
gap)? What could be done? How your study addresses the gaps in the previous studies?
Methods
Here you explain the methodology or sources of data/information and how do you collect. You should also
describe the type of data (qualitative or quantitative) and how collected data can be useful. You can collect
data from a real-life organisation or using secondary sources. You can also use some database such as
Scopus, google scholar, science direct and so on if you collect data from secondary sources. In these
databases, you can find lot of published papers with their own data; you can use them but must be cited.
Please make sure that your method reflects the development of feasible and effective solutions to address
the complex issue(s).
Structure and format the case study findings and analysis
Provide a description of the organisation in the case study (1/2 page). Then critically evaluate the ethics
and/or sustainability issue in the light of the literature and discuss the recommendations. Please make sure
that your evaluation reflects the theoretical concepts underpinning the discipline of business ethics. Also
make that your evaluation reflects the originality of potential solutions. (New techniques, knowledge,
applications and management practice). Further, your evaluation shall reflect justification for innovative
ideas and processes.
Conclusion
You need to discuss your findings and how the findings can be helpful for the business and what are the
risks for implementation. You should also discuss if there any limitation of the study. Conclusion opens with
a summary of the report and then considers the consequences of the suggestions. No new material should
be introduced in this section.
Appendices (if any) Your appendices may contain, for example, detailed tables of data, details of how you
did a calculation, interview records if included, or photographs if of some interest.
References: The project is directed at the collection and analysis of data, if you use material from another
source then references it properly. You need to cite 10-15 references from journal, report and so on. A
video link for referencing style (Harvard referencing style) is available at

READ ALSO...   a philanthropic organization

Other important notes:
• Use Font 12 Times new roman with 1.5 spacing, single column, justified and 2.5 cm margin in all four
sides for the report body and submit a Microsoft Word file.
• All assignments must include a group cover sheet which is downloadable from APIC website.
• While your experience and views are the essential components of your assignments, the appropriate
use of literature is required to provide evidence-based suggestions.

READ ALSO...   Assignment: Explain the flow of funds within an organization including private pay and third-party reimbursement. Assignment Description: This assignment will be at least 1000 – 1250 words or more Thi 1 | StudyDaddy.com - Original paper

•You should include a list of all references you use in writing your assignments. Note that all assignments
will be checked for originality (similarities to existing sources) on Turnitin. You should follow instruction
of your lecture for attaching Turnitin report with your assignment.
The criteria to assess your work will take into account:
• Relevance of your answer to the question or task set
• Clarity of expression
• Creativity/innovation
• Citations beyond the given subject material
• Logical planning and sequence
• Appropriate written and presentation of the work.
• The assessment for individual group members may be moderated by students’ peer assessment
(evaluating the performance of each group member).
In completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to effectively to design and apply the
knowledge, tools and techniques required to build better strategies in organisational context.
Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric
The assessment will be marked out of 100%and will be weighted 40% of the total unit mark. The
marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric
Marking Criteria
Not satisfactory
(0-49%) of the
criterion mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64%) of the
criterion mark
Good
(65-74%) of the
criterion mark
Very Good
(75-84%) of the
criterion mark
Excellent
(85-100%) of the criterion
mark
Literature review around
the case study topic (40 %)
Lacks basic knowledge
or/and skills of
conducting literature
review and evaluating of
major issues related to
business ethics and/or
sustainability.
Evidence of basic knowledge
and skill of conducting
literature review and
evaluating of major issues
related to business ethics
and/or sustainability.
Has good skills of
conducting literature
review and evaluating
major issues related to
business ethics and/or
sustainability.
Has very good skills in the
evaluation of conducting
literature review and
evaluating major issues
related to business ethics
and/or sustainability.
Excellent skills of conducting
literature review and evaluating
major issues related to business
ethics and/or sustainability.
Methodology (30%)
Lacks basic knowledge
or/and skills in the
evaluation of theoretical
concepts underpinning
business ethics and/or
sustainability.
Evidence of basic knowledge
and skill in the evaluation of
theoretical concepts
underpinning business
ethics and/or sustainability.
Has good skills in the
evaluation of theoretical
concepts underpinning
business ethics and/or
sustainability.
Has very good skills in the
evaluation of theoretical
concepts underpinning
business ethics and/or
sustainability.
Excellent skills in the evaluation
of theoretical concepts
underpinning business ethics
and/or sustainability.
Conclusion (20%)
Lacks basic knowledge
or/and skills in reflecting
consideration of business
ethics and/or
sustainability
Evidence of basic knowledge
and skill in reflecting
consideration of business
ethics and/or sustainability.
Has good skills in reflecting
consideration of business
ethics and/or
sustainability.
Has very good skills in
reflecting consideration of
business ethics and/or
sustainability.
Excellent skills in reflecting
consideration of business ethics
and/or sustainability.
References (Use at least ten
academic references &
consistent in style) (10%)
Poor academic writing
skills with grammar and
spelling errors. Poor
presentation structure
Satisfactory writing skills
with grammar and spelling
errors. Poor presentation
structure and failed to
Good academic writing
skills with minor grammar
and spelling errors. Clear
presentation structure
Excellent writing skills
without grammar and
spelling errors. Excellent
presentation structure
Exceptional academic writing
skills. Professional presentation
structure following Harvard
referencing style
and failed to follow
Harvard referencing style
follow Harvard referencing
style
following Harvard
referencing style
following Harvard
referencing style
Assessment 3: Viva Voce
Due date:
Week 10
Group/individual:
Individual
Word count/Time provided:
15 minutes (equiv. 1500 words)
Weighting:
30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:
ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4, ULO-5
Assessment 3 Detail
A Viva Voce assessment is an oral examination and verbal defence of a written assessment. The
written assessment for the Viva Voce assessment is based on Assessment 2: Case Study, which was
submitted in Week 7. The details of the Viva questions for the oral and written examination will be
given by Lecture two weeks before the assessment due during the trimester.
Assessments 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric
The assessment will be marked out of 100% and will be weighted at 30% of the total unit mark. The
marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric
Marking Criteria
Not Satisfactory
(0-49% of the criterion
mark)
Satisfactory
(50-64% of the criterion
mark)
Good
(65-74% of the criterion
mark)
Very Good
(75-84% of the criterion
mark)
Excellent
(85-100% of the criterion
mark)
Demonstrate an
understanding of the Viva
(Case Study evaluation)
questions in oral
examination (20%)
Inadequate understanding
of the Viva questions (Case
Study evaluation) and major
issues are not identified
Basic understanding of the
Viva questions (Case Study
evaluation) and major issues
were identified partially
Exhibits breadth and depth
of understanding of the Viva
questions (Case Study
evaluation) and major issues
were identified clearly
Exhibits accurate and
detailed breadth and depth
of understanding of the Viva
(Case Study evaluation)
questions and major issues
were discussed well
Displays exceptional ability
in and understanding of the
Viva questions (Case Study
evaluation) and major issues
were discussed critically.
Demonstrate an
understanding of the Viva
questions in written
examination (20%)
Inadequate understanding
of the Viva questions (Case
Study evaluation) and major
issues are not identified
Basic understanding of the
Viva questions (Case Study
evaluation) and major issues
were identified partially
Exhibits breadth and depth
of understanding of the Viva
questions (Case Study
evaluation) and major issues
were identified clearly
Exhibits accurate and
detailed breadth and depth
of understanding of the Viva
questions (Case Study
evaluation) and major issues
were discussed well
Displays exceptional ability
in and understanding of the
Viva questions (Case Study
evaluation) and major issues
were discussed critically.
Demonstrate analytical and
critical thinking skills (40%)
Poorly articulated,
unconvincing evidences
provided. Lack of theories
application
Basic communication of
some facts in support of
case solution. Lack of theory
application
Evidence of clear convincing
facts and evidences
provided. Some theories
applied for the analysis
Above average use of
evidence to support the
case analysis. Good theory
application
Sophisticated use of
evidence to support the
case analysis. Excellent
theory application
Presentation and
communication
(20%)
Poorly demonstrate
professional presentation
manner with clear speech
and right pace with
enthusiasm.
Satisfactory demonstrate
professional presentation
manner with clear speech
and right pace with
enthusiasm.
Good demonstrate
professional presentation
manner with clear speech
and right pace with
enthusiasm.
Very good demonstrate
professional presentation
manner with clear speech
and right pace with
enthusiasm.
Excellent demonstrate
professional presentation
manner with clear speech
and right pace with
enthusiasm.

READ ALSO...   Tutor or the Convenor at least several weeks
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER