BSS059-6 Digital Technology Management SB is a worldwide organization MSc Management with Streams real-life simulation of a Unit…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Submission Deadline
Marks and Feedback
Before 10am on: 21/05/2021
20 working days after deadline (L4, 5 and 7)
15 working days after deadline (L6)
10 working days after deadline (block delivery)   07/06/2021 
Unit title & code
BSS059-6 Digital Technology Management
Assignment number and title
2 Information Systems Concept Design
Assignment type
PJ-Art – Project
Weighting of assignment
60%
Size or length of assessment
20 Minute video recording consisting of multiple materials/write up
Unit learning outcomes
  Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding Demonstrate a systematic understanding and critical appreciation of the business impact of digital technology and how it should be managed in a variety of business settings, with the aim of maximising a company’s success. Demonstrate the following skills and abilities Critically evaluate and synthesise theories and models in order to manage digital technology appropriately as well as make strategic decisions to foster its positive impact on businesses  

What am I required to do in this assignment?
  Assessment Task Note: This Assessment is based on the Report you submitted for assessment 1, and you are to work on the same company you selected for assessment 1.   You are required to critically evaluate the strategic information systems (SIS) opportunities identified in assessment 1. Based on the SIS opportunities identified related to the selected company you are required to Design and propose a plan for an information system which can help solve a problem within the company. Additionally, critically evaluate challenges related to systems design and analysis. The proposed design and plan should be presented in a form of a 20-minutes video recording presenting multiple project materials/Write ups. The video recording must show students faces in the recordings. Materials/write ups should consist of: Considering the SIS opportunities identified in assessment 1, you are required to propose a Design and plan for an information system. The information systems design and plan should consider the following elements: Concept Design should include a discussion on the following: Specific Data requirements – this should be based on the requirements of the SIS opportunities for your chosen company Specific features of the systems (these do not have to be technical) – this should be based on the requirements of the SIS opportunities for your chosen company Indication of Information generated by the System – this should be based on the requirements of the SIS opportunities for your chosen company Indication of possible users of the system – this should be based on the requirements of the SIS opportunities for your chosen company Indication of specific hardware requirements and configuration for the system – Data/information flow diagram: The diagram should show how information/ data is transfer from one point to another in the proposed systems design. The diagram should clearly indicate the various types of information/ data being used and transferred within a system The diagram should clearly indicate a starting and end points of the information/ data flow User Interface (UI) Sketches: Possible sketches of what the user interface of the system will look like. The user interfaces should highlight specific features of the system that users will have access to. Create a story board of User interface – if possible Systems Analysis and Design Challenges   Your work will be marked against the criteria indicated on page 3 of this document  
What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)
  In order to pass Assessment 2 you will need to: Demonstrate sufficient ability to critically evaluate challenges related to systems design and analysis or IT project management and how these challenges may be overcome from a managerial perspective.  
How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?
  By attending teaching sessions, preparing for and engaging in these sessions, doing wider reading and research, thinking critically and adhering to the assessment brief. It is important that the submitted work links to relevant concepts and theories discussed in class or based on relevant sources. You should be able to demonstrate excellent knowledge of Systems analysis and designIt is important that sufficient academic sources are used to support key points of arguments in the report. Alignment between discussions and concepts Additional details will be provided in organized support sessions during the teaching. Follow the instructions based on the in-class discussions  
How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?
  The scheduled lessons aim to provide a sound basis to the topic that is being assessed in the assignment. Thus, there is a direct link between the assignment and the content covered in scheduled sessions: Session 5 “Strategic Information systems” and Session 11 “Systems Analysis and Design”  

READ ALSO...   Care Coordination Plan Script for a 20 min length audio. - No Plagiarism

How will my assignment be marked?
  Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.   You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.      
 
Pass – 40-49%
Pass – 50-59%
Commendation – 60-69%
Distinction– 70%+
1 Identification of useful concepts of Systems Analysis and Design (30%)
Demonstrates sufficient ability to critically evaluate challenges related to systems design and analysis or IT project management and how these challenges may be overcome from a managerial perspective.   A narrow view with limited use of concepts that might aid understanding of systems analysis and design in a coherent or detailed way
Demonstrates good ability to critically evaluate challenges related to systems design and analysis or IT project management and how these challenges may be overcome from a managerial perspective.   An average answer using some concepts that might aid understanding of systems analysis and design in a reasonably coherent way
Demonstrates very good ability to critically evaluate challenges related to systems design and analysis or IT project management and how these challenges may be overcome from a managerial perspective.   A good answer, structures the problem in a logical way using concepts to aid understanding of systems analysis and design demonstrating a reasonable breadth of understanding of the issues
Demonstrate sufficient ability to critically evaluate challenges related to systems design and analysis or IT project management and how these challenges may be overcome from a managerial perspective.   A good answer demonstrating a comprehensive consideration of concepts that aid understanding of systems analysis and design in a coherent or detailed way,  enabling different arguments to be presented in a logical order.
2 Understanding of Managerial challenges  (30%)
Insufficient understanding of key managerial implications and challenges in implementations of information systems
A reasonable understanding of key managerial implications and challenges in implementations of information systems
A good understanding of key managerial implications and challenges in implementations of information systems. The answer is well supported by key concepts
Key managerial implications and challenges in implementations of information systems and highlighted in excellent detail. The answer is well supported by key concepts and links well with systems design
3 Depth and Breadth  of Analysis (20%)
A limited number of points made. Weak use of any external data to support the points. Poor analysis
A limited range of appropriate analysis points made but more as a list then as a unified piece of work. Limited secondary sources s provided to support the points made
A well-constructed piece of work. Literature critically evaluated to produce a good analysis, not merely a précis. Good use of secondary data sources.
A very well constructed piece of work which demonstrates the student’s ability to analyse and synthesise complex arguments. It has a logical flow and all the points made follow from and are supported by the evidence.
5 Clarity and Cohesion of Findings (10%)
A limited number of points made with little attempt to interrelate them to form a coherent discussion. insufficiently argued with rather unconvincing conclusions. Doubts that the conclusions are valid. Poor use of any external data to support the points.
Some appropriate points made but more as a list then as a unified piece of work. ‘Reader presented with bricks rather than building’. The work is reasonably argued but the conclusions are not  entirely convincing. Secondary sources  provided to support the points made
A very well constructed piece of work. Literature critically evaluated not merely a précis. The work is reasonably soundly argued and the conclusions are largely convincing.
An excellently constructed piece of work which clearly demonstrates the student’s ability to synthesise complex arguments and to use the data to come up with novel solutions. It has a logical flow and the conclusions follow naturally from the evidence presented. No doubts are  left in the reader’s mind as to their validity.
6 Presentation and referencing (10%)
Presentation is acceptable, but referencing at minimal standard with few references.
Good presentation with a acceptable range of references. Harvard standard correctly applied
A wide range of references used.  The report is very well presented and written – well done.
Very good report, very well written presented and referenced no major flaws.

READ ALSO...   apply the knowledge and skills
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER