FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay
BM 565 Digital Technology and Business
Bhairavi Tarkas/Assad Shamsi
Assignment No. and type:
CW1 2000 Word Report ( Plus supporting evidence)
Submission time and date:
Electronic submission on BB. 19th March 2021 before 2:00 pm Uk Time
Target feedback time and date:
Tasks Select an appropriate technological topic from the lecture series and write a 2,000-word report review on the themes, trends and arguments emerging about that topic. The topic is to be agreed with lecturer before detailed research on it has begun. This means a) needs to be completed and agreed first. The report should include: Why you deem this topic to be of importance. How this has topic has developedA detailed description of the technology used in this topic and what it is used for.What technological platforms and software are used in the topicWhat type of business and organisation uses the technology How is it used as a business tool and is this effective? Approximately 45% of word count How does this relate to course content and discussion on the nature of the relationship between digital technologies and both old and newly emerging theories on business and management structures and practices? Approximately 55% of word count The work should relate to theories and models set out in the course content and other referenced source material, and course material and include critical discussion of these from those sources.
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes:
Critically evaluate the role of present and future technologies in the business environment
Demonstrate an understanding of the significance of digital and new technologies in an ever-changing global business environment and the challenges these present to managers
Carry out all the assignment tasks in accordance with the instructions in this assignment brief and other supporting material.Ensure that at least 80% of your referenced material is from module sources and material cited in these sources.The use of other sources must be relevant to the module and the assignment and fully justified in its use.Ensure that that your answers to the tasks are coherent and specifically relate to the tasks and that they demonstrate critical and correct applications of justified sources. The word count excludes charts, tables, and other supporting material
Referencing and research requirements
Please reference your work according to the [Harvard style as defined in Cite Them Right Online (http://www.citethemrightonline.com). This information is also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2019) Cite them right: the essential reference guide. 11th edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are available via the University library.
How your work will be assessed
Your work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates your achievement of the stated learning outcomes for this assignment (see below) and against other key criteria, as defined in the University’s institutional grading descriptors. A proportion of your marks will also depend upon your use of academic referencing conventions and as per the instructions in the task requirements. This assignment will be marked according to the grading descriptors for Level 6.
Criteria Weighting 70% 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% Fail Knowledge and Understanding Displays excellent demonstration and critical understanding of the significance of digital and new technologies in an ever- changing global business environment and the challenges these present to managers Clear Demonstration and understanding of the significance of digital and new technologies in an ever changing global business environment and the challenges these present to managers Very good demonstration of most aspects of the significance of digital and new technologies in an ever changing global business environment and the challenges these present to managers. Tendency to be over descriptive. Some effective management of each stage of the research: objectives attempted but not always appropriate, some objectives met, some useful attempts at research techniques but lacks coherent linkage to each other and no clear attempt to demonstrate how insight would be gained Majority of stages of the research process are inadequate resulting in poor or link to techniques with lack of clarity n the writing up. No reference to insight or objectives Analysis 30% Detailed and perceptive analysis of course and other material to support investigation into the chosen topic Detailed analysis of course and other material to support investigation into the chosen topic Weak or limited analysis of course and other material to support investigation into the chosen topic No real analysis of course or other material to support investigation into the chosen topic. Just a series of non-interrelated descriptions No attempt to use course material or other referenced sources Evaluation 30% Thorough critique of emerging discussions on this topic with clear rationale leading to a set of justified final observations on the future of this topic Some critique of emerging discussions on this topic with clear rationale leading to a set of justified final observations on the future of this topic Descriptions of some emerging discussions on this topic limited attempt at some justified final observations on the future of this topic Very limited and descriptive points about the topic on this topic which no attempt at clear rationale or a set of justified final observations on the future of this topic No descriptions of issues related directed to this topic or reasoned rationale to support a set of final observations Word count Harvard Referencing 5% 5% Within 10% of word count Fully adheres to rules of Harvard Referencing in text and in reference list. Digital referencing excellent Within 15% of word count Adheres to rules of Harvard Referencing in text and in reference list Digital referencing good Within 15% of word count Mostly adheres to rules of Harvard Referencing in in text and ref list. Digital referencing attempted but not complete Within 15% of word count Mostly adheres to rules of Harvard Referencing in text, some elements missing in reference list. Digital referencing poor Misses word count (too long or too short) Too many errors in referencing No evidence of any attempt to edit into a cohesive document.
This assignment should be submitted electronically. Please use the relevant Turnitin submission point in the Submit your work area in your Blackboard module shell. You are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic misconduct, which can be viewed on the University website: https://bucks.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/9546/Academic-Misconduct-Policy.pdf. In submitting your assignment, you are acknowledging that you have read and understood these regulations.Please also note that work that is submitted up to 10 working days beyond the submission date will be considered a late submission. Late submissions will be marked, and the actual mark recorded but will be capped at the pass mark (typically 40%), provided that the work is of a passing standard. Work submitted after this period will not be marked and will be treated as a non-submission.
Before you submit
Please use the provided checklist below to make sure you are ‘fit to submit’ your work.We recommend you use this checklist as soon as you get this assignment brief to help you plan your work
Fit to Submit: Assignment Checklist
This brief assignment checklist is designed to help you avoid some of the most common mistakes students make in their coursework. HAVE YOU READ THE ASSIGNMENT BRIEF? IF NOT, DO IT NOW!In it you will find details of the assessment task, word count, the assessment criteria your work is marked against, and the learning outcomes – the basis for the assessment strategy in each module. Students often lose marks by forgetting some of the more straightforward elements of their assignments. We recommend that you “tick off” each of the points below as you prepare your work for submission. If you need any help, ask your tutor and / or visit https://bucks.ac.uk/students/academicadvice/assessment-and-examination TICK
Have you read and understood the assessment criteria? Have you met the learning outcomes? You will lose marks and your work may even be failed if you have not. Have you demonstrated you can think and writecritically in the completed work? This means you have supported your arguments/explanations appropriately e.g., using relevant academic sources and you have offered discussion points which extends your own or others’ viewpoints to make reasoned conclusions/judgements. Have you maintained an academic tone throughout your work? Is your work formal, focused, developed and clear? Have you checked that the referencing in your assignment is in line with your programme requirements? Have you proof-read your work and used spellcheck software to check your spelling and grammar? Have you checked the presentation of your work is as specified by your tutor, for example, are font size, colour, style, line spacing and margins as the tutor specified? Have you kept to the word count (or equivalent)? If you are not sure, check with your tutor.
Can you confirm that the work submitted is your own and not plagiarised?
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER