BIS2002 Systems Analysis and Design MIS606 Professional Practice

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

Assessment Brief: BIS2002 Systems Analysis and DesignTrimester 2, 2021Assessment Overview
Assessment Task
Type
Weighting
Length
Due
ULOsAssessed
Assessment 1: Case Study-1Study and analyze the ITinfrastructure hardware, softwareand networking requirements for acase study organization.
Group
30%
2500words
Week 5
ULO-1ULO-2
Assessment 2: Case Study-2Network design, IP address androuting protocol selection andconfiguration.
Individual
30%
2500words
Week 12
ULO-2ULO-3ULO-4ULO-5
Assessment 3: Project DesignWeekly exercises assess students’ability to understand theoreticalmaterials.
IndividualInvigilated
40%
2500equiv.
Weeks2, 4, 6, 8,10
ULO-1ULO-2ULO-3ULO-4ULO-5
equiv. – equivalent word count based on the Assessment Load Equivalence Guide. It means this assessment isequivalent to the normally expected time requirement for a written submission containing the specifiednumber of words.2Assessment 1: Case Study-1
Due date:
Week 5
Group/individual:
Group
Word count / Time provided:
2500 words
Weighting:
30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:
ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3
Assessment Details:In this assignment, you have to perform a system analysis and design for the Gold-Cinema System(GCS) case study provided below.Case Study: Gold-Cinema System (GCS)The Gold- Cinema is a ticket office that would like to develop an online system for keeping track ofcustomers, productions, performances, and seats. The Gold- Cinema intends to keep track of theircustomers to notify their customers about upcoming events and identify loyal customers. For thispurpose, customers require to create an account before booking any ticket for the first time. TheInformation records on the online system consist of first and last name, residential address, city, zipcode, mobile number, and email address. After entering all the information, a unique identificationnumber is created for each customer (customer’s ID) membership. If the customers face any issueswith creating an account or booking a ticket, the advisor needs to support them. In this case, the onlinesystem needs to record the assigned advisor for each customer by using the customer’s ID each time.Further, the new online system keeps the information of the name and type of the program, such asmovie, play, or concert. Also, the number of tickets sold for each program and the date of performanceis precisely recorded.The cinema management wishes to operate an entirely testable procedure to the whole online systemto discover any bug and major issues before the final launch of the system. The duration of the projectis two months.The company considers different methods to estimate the investments in this project. Table 1presents the information the accountant provided to the system analyst to calculate Net Present Value(NPV), Payback Period and Return on Investment (ROI).Table 1: Five-year investment evaluation
Year
No.
Category

1
2
3
4
5
1
Value of benefits
$ 9,000.00
$ 9,000.00
$ 9,000.00
$ 9,000.00
$ 9,000.00
2
Development Cost
-$15,000.00
-$700.00
– $850.00
-$770.00
-$750.00
-$730.00
3
Annual expenses
-$ 3,000.00
-$ 3,000.00
-$ 3,000.00
-$ 3,000.00
-$ 3,000.00
4
Net benefit/costs
-$15,000.00
5
Discount factor
1.00
6
Net present value
-$15,000.00
7
Cumulative NPV
-$15,000.00
Tasks:1. Develop your introduction and clearly define the aims and objectives of the report.2. Develop system vision document with all details.3. Explain the requirements for the new system (FURPS requirements)4. Develop a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) description supported with a table for the GCSproject explaining the ID, description, and duration for each task based on the project’sduration.5. Develop PERT/CPM chart explaining the early and late start for each task. Identify the criticalpath and the total time to finish the project.6. Recognize internal and external stakeholders for the new system.7. Use the information in Table 1, calculate the net present value, the payback period, and thereturn on investment using a discount rate of 6%. The development costs for the project were$15,000. Do a five-year return on investment.You may need to make some assumption as required. Whenever you make assumptions, pleasestate these clearly.Assignment Format
Submission:Length:Font size:Line spacing:Cover sheet:Referencing:
Only through Canvas2500 words max (+ or – 10%)12pt (min) Times Roman1.5 or double line spacingAPIC standard coversheetUse Harvard referencing only
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30%of the total unit mark.
MarkingCriteria
Not satisfactory(0-49%) of thecriterion mark)
Satisfactory(50-64%) of thecriterion mark
Good(65-74%) of thecriterion mark
Very Good(75-84%) of thecriterion mark
Excellent(85-100%) of thecriterion mark
Introduction(10%)
Poor introduction withirrelevant details
Introduction ispresented briefly andis missing the reportoutline
Introduction isgenerally presentedalong with the reportoutline
Introduction is wellwritten, and thereport outline is alsodiscussed
Introduction is verywell written, and thereport outline is alsodiscussed
System visiondocument (15%)
Poor development of thesystem vision document.
Brief development ofthe system visiondocument.
Good development ofthe system visiondocument.
Well development ofthe system visiondocument.
Excellentdevelopment of thesystem visiondocument.
FURPSrequirements(10%)
Poor description ofFURPS requirements
Brief description ofFURPS requirements
Generally gooddescription of FURPSrequirements
Clear description ofFURPS requirements
Very good descriptionof FURPSrequirements
Work BreakdownStructure (WBS)(15%)
Poor description with nopoor table for the GCproject includes the ID,description, and durationfor each task.
Brief description withbrief table for the GCproject to include theID, description, andduration for each task.
Generally gooddescription with goodsupported table forthe GC project toexplain the ID,description, andduration for each task.
Clear description witha good supportedtable for the GCproject to explain theID, description, andduration for each task.
Very good descriptionwith very goodsupported table forthe GC project toexplain the ID,description, andduration for each task.
PERT/CPM chart(15%)
Lack of evidence ofunderstanding ofPERT/CPM chart with noidentification of criticalpath and the total timeto finish the project.
Evidence of basicunderstanding ofPERT/CPM chart withno clear identificationof critical path and thetotal time to finish theproject.
Evidence of goodunderstanding andidentification ofPERT/CPM chart withclear identification ofcritical path and thetotal time to finish theproject.
Clear understandingand identification ofPERT/CPM chart withclear identification ofcritical path and thetotal time to finish theproject.
Excellentunderstanding andidentification ofPERT/CPM chart withclear identification ofcritical path and thetotal time to finish theproject.
Internal andExternalstakeholders(10%)
Poor description ofinternal and externalstakeholders.
Brief description ofinternal and externalstakeholders.
Generally gooddescription of internaland externalstakeholders.
Clear description ofinternal and externalstakeholders.
Very good descriptionof internal andexternal stakeholders.
Table-1(20%)
Table-1 is missing ormost of the requiredfields do not correct
Some fields of thetable not correct ormissing
All fields are availablebut many of them notaccurate.
All field are availableand some not veryaccurate
All fields are availableand accurate
Summary(5%)
Summary notrelating to thereport
Brief summary of thereport with somerelevance
Generally goodsummary of thereport
A section clearlysummarizing theoverallcontribution
A section veryclearlysummarizing theoverallcontribution
Assessment 2: Case Study-2
Due date:
Week 12
Group/individual:
Individual
Word count / Time provided:
2500
Weighting:
30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:
ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4
Assessment Details:The Case Study-2 assessment covers the following topics: information system development, systemdevelopment approaches, data modelling, IS project management, system requirements, user andsystem interfaces, and system testing, deployment and maintenance.This assessment allows students to apply theoretical concepts to practice by analyzing case studiesand proposing a suitable design. The Case Study-2 assessment covers the following topics:information system development, system development approaches, data Modeling, IS projectmanagement, system requirements, user and system interfaces, and system testing, deploymentand maintenance.Case Study: Online System for Kangaroo TaxiKangaroo Taxi is a new company in Australia, offering online booking services for their users. KangarooTaxi is about to launch an easy-to-use website allowing its users to access from smartphones. Thewebsite will enable the users to plan and book their trip. Upon the first use, users would be able toenter their details into the system, including their means of payments (e.g., credit card, PayPal, etc.).This will allow the users to use the Kangaroo Taxi in any subsequent bookings as well. Users can simplylog in to their registered accounts and make a booking for a taxi by entering their pickup anddestination address. The system will provide them with an estimated cost according to thisinformation.Suppose you are asked to develop this online system for Kangaroo Taxi. You have been given onlythree weeks to come up with a blueprint of the system design. After that, you will be presenting yourdesign to a team of consultants. The online system should perform several activities such as adding orcreating a new user, checking for available taxis and drivers in the area requested by the customer,calculating the cost of a trip, issuing an online ticket or receipt and processing all bookingstransactions. In addition, you may add any other functions for this system.Tasks: Draw use case description for registering accounts and making a booking. Draw use case diagram. Identify all entities and their attribute and draw an E-R (Entity-Relationship) diagram. Draw the class diagram. Draw a Sequence diagram. Draw activity diagram.

Design a data entry screen for entering membership details.Design a booking taxi input screen that includes the date, time, pickup and destinationaddress, type of the service, passenger name, contact number and payment methods.
 Plan suitable testing and deployment activities.if you believe that you need to make additional assumptions, clearly state them for each situation*You can use Microsoft Visio or Microsoft Word to present your design.Assignment Format
Submission:Length:Font size:Line spacing:Cover sheet:Referencing:
Only through Canvas2500 words max (+ or – 10%)12pt (min) Times Roman1.5 or double line spacingAPIC standard coversheetUse Harvard referencing only
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30%of the total unit mark.
MarkingCriteria
Not satisfactory(0-49%) of thecriterion mark)
Satisfactory(50-64%) of thecriterion mark
Good(65-74%) of thecriterion mark
Very Good(75-84%) of thecriterion mark
Excellent(85-100%) of thecriterion mark
Introduction(5%)
Poor introduction withirrelevant details
Introduction ispresented briefly andis missing the reportoutline
Introduction isgenerally presentedalong with the reportoutline
Introduction is wellwritten, and thereport outline is alsodiscussed
Introduction is verywell written, and thereport outline is alsodiscussed
Use Casedescription(10%)
Poorly discussion of theuse case description
Brief discussion of theuse case description
Good discussion of theuse case description
Well discussion of theuse case description
Excellent discussion ofthe use casedescription
Use Case diagram(10%)
Lack of evidence ofunderstanding of usecase diagram
Evidence of basicunderstanding of usecase diagram
Evidence of goodunderstanding of usecase diagram
Clear understandingof use case diagram
Has excellentunderstanding of usecase diagram
Entities, Attributesand ER diagram(10%)
Poor identification anddescription of Entities,Attributes and ERdiagram
Brief identificationand description ofEntities, Attributesand ER diagram
Generally goodidentification anddescription of Entities,Attributes and ERdiagram
Clear descriptionidentification anddescription of Entities,Attributes and ERdiagram
Excellentidentification anddescription of Entities,Attributes and ERdiagram
Class Diagram(10%)
Lack of evidence ofunderstanding of ClassDiagram
Evidence of basicunderstanding of ClassDiagram
Evidence of goodunderstanding andidentification of ClassDiagram
Clear understandingand identification ofClass Diagram
Has excellentunderstanding andidentification of ClassDiagram
Sequence diagram(10%)
Poor identification anddescription of Sequencediagram
Brief identificationand description ofSequence diagram
Generally goodidentification anddescription ofSequence diagram
Clear descriptionidentification anddescription ofSequence diagram
Excellentidentification anddescription ofSequence diagram
Activity diagram(10%)
Poor identification anddescription of activitydiagram
Brief identificationand description ofactivity diagram
Generally goodidentification anddescription of activitydiagram
clear descriptionidentification anddescription of activitydiagram
Excellentidentification anddescription of activitydiagram
Design a data entryscreen (5%)
Poor design of data entryscreen
Brief design of dataentry screen
Good design of dataentry screen
Well design of dataentry screen
Excellent design ofdata entry screen
Design a bookingtaxi input screen(10%)
Poor design of bookingtaxi input screen
Brief design ofbooking taxi inputscreen
Good design ofbooking taxi inputscreen
Well design of bookingtaxi input screen
Excellent design ofbooking taxi inputscreen
Assessment 3: Project Design
Due date:
Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10
Group/individual:
Individual
Word count / Time provided:
2500
Weighting:
40%
Unit Learning Outcomes:
ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3, ULO-4, ULO-5
Assessment Details:A project has been developed for the students to work on that through the semester. Students willneed to do various activities every week and will be required to provide answers and achieve identifiedoutcomes.Students will not be assessed on work that the tutor has not seen them produce in class, so thatattendance is required as part of this assessment. However, students are required to submit the workthat they have completed during the tutorial session.Project Design: Kido Library Web Application (KLWA)Kido Library (KL) wants to develop a simple web application to manage services for kids. Theapplication will allow users to access some services online. Some examples for these services includemembership, loan, search for resources, reserve resources, return and many other features. Theproject requires launching in August 2022.You have just completed your bachelor’s studies and got an opportunity to work on this project. Youneed to design this application based on the library’s requirements.Task: Week2: Explain the responsibilities of the project manager for this project? Week4: a) Create a Work Breakdown Structure that lists all the steps to complete theproject. b) Develop PERT/CPM chart explaining the early and late start for each task. Identifythe critical path and the total time to finish the project. Week6: a) Draw the Class diagram b) Draw an entity-relationship diagram. Week8: Draw a network diagram that will support this configuration. Week10: Plan suitable testing and deployment activities.
Testing anddeploymentactivities(10%)
Poor description oftesting and deploymentactivities
Brief identificationand description oftesting anddeployment activities
Generally goodidentification anddescription of testingand deploymentactivities
Clear descriptionidentification anddescription of testingand deploymentactivities
Excellentidentification anddescription of testingand deploymentactivities
Summary(5%)
Summary notrelating to thereport
Brief summary of thereport with somerelevance
Generally goodsummary of thereport
A section clearlysummarizing theoverallcontribution
A section veryclearlysummarizing theoverallcontribution
References usingHarvard style(5%)
Lacks consistency withmany errors.
Unclearreferencing/style
Generally goodreferencing/style
Clear referencing/style
Clear styles withexcellent sourceof references.
Assignment Format
Submission:Font size:Line spacing:
Only through Canvas12pt (min) Times Roman1.5 or double line spacing
Marking Criteria and Rubric: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 40%of the total unit mark
MarkingCriteria
Not satisfactory(0-49%) of thecriterion mark)
Satisfactory(50-64%) of thecriterion mark
Good(65-74%) of thecriterion mark
Very Good(75-84%) of thecriterion mark
Excellent(85-100%) of thecriterion mark
Project managerresponsibilities(10%)
Poorly discussion of theProject managerresponsibilities
Brief discussion of theProject managerresponsibilities
Good discussion of theProject managerresponsibilities
Well discussion of theProject managerresponsibilities
Excellent discussion ofProject managerresponsibilities
Work BreakdownStructure (WBS)(15%)
Poor description with nopoor table for the KLWAproject to include the ID,description, and durationfor each task.
Brief description withbrief table for theKLWA project toinclude the ID,description, andduration for each task.
Generally gooddescription with goodsupported table forthe KLWA project toexplain the ID,description, andduration for each task.
Clear description withgood supported tablefor the KLWA projectto explain the ID,description, andduration for each task.
Very good descriptionwith very goodsupported table forthe KLWA project toexplain the ID,description, andduration for each task.
PERT/CPM chart(15%)
Lack of evidence ofunderstanding ofPERT/CPM chart with noidentification of criticalpath and the total timeto finish the project.
Evidence of a basicunderstanding ofPERT/CPM chart withno clear identificationof critical path and thetotal time to finish theproject.
Evidence of goodunderstanding andidentification ofPERT/CPM chart withclear identification ofcritical path and thetotal time to finish theproject.
Clear understandingand identification ofPERT/CPM chart withclear identification ofcritical path and thetotal time to finish theproject.
Has excellentunderstanding andidentification ofPERT/CPM chart withclear identification ofcritical path and thetotal time to finish theproject.
Class Diagram(15%)
Lack of evidence ofunderstanding of ClassDiagram
Evidence of basicunderstanding of ClassDiagram
Evidence of goodunderstanding andidentification of ClassDiagram
Clear understandingand identification ofClass Diagram
Has excellentunderstanding andidentification of ClassDiagram
Entities, Attributesand ER diagram(15%)
Poor identification anddescription of Entities,Attributes and ERdiagram
Brief identificationand description ofEntities, Attributesand ER diagram
Generally goodidentification anddescription of Entities,Attributes and ERdiagram
Clear descriptionidentification anddescription of Entities,Attributes and ERdiagram
Excellentidentification anddescription of Entities,Attributes and ERdiagram
Network Diagram(15%)
Lack of evidence ofunderstanding ofNetwork Diagram
Evidence of basicunderstanding ofNetwork Diagram
Evidence of goodunderstanding andidentification ofNetwork Diagram
Clear understandingand identification ofNetwork Diagram
Has excellentunderstanding andidentification ofNetwork Diagram
Testing anddeploymentactivities(15%)
Poor description oftesting and deploymentactivities
Brief identificationand description oftesting anddeployment activities
Generally goodidentification anddescription of testingand deploymentactivities
Clear descriptionidentification anddescription of testingand deploymentactivities
Excellentidentification anddescription of testingand deploymentactivities

READ ALSO...   Quality Management
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER