Abstract is excellent the Perspective of Energy Saving BIS2001 IT Infrastructure and Networking Managing and Monitoring Mutual O…

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

High Distinction (100%-
85%)
Distinction (84%-75%)
Credit (74%-65%)
Pass (64%-50%)
Fail (< 50%)
Abstract (5%)
– Concise summary of the
purpose of the essay
– Presents the position
adopted
– Summarises the main
argument
– Conclusion
– Maximum of 200 words
Abstract is excellent – clear,
accurate, and concise. All
necessary components are
included and no unnecessary
information is present.
Conforms to word length.
Abstract is very good –
mostly clear and/or concise.
Necessary components are
included and described with
only minor errors (i.e.,
incorrect statement,
omission/lack of detail, or
unnecessary inclusion).
Conforms to word length.
Abstract is good – necessary
components are generally
included, however, there is a
major error or a few minor
errors (i.e., incorrect
statements, omissions/lack
of detail, or unnecessary
statements). May not
conform to word length (i.e.,
too long or too short).
A genuine attempt at an
abstract is present, but there
are multiple major errors
(i.e., incorrect statements,
omissions/lack of detail, or
unnecessary inclusions).
May not conform to word
length (i.e., too long or too
short).
Abstract is missing or
attempted but inadequate.
Introduction (15%)
-Introduces the general topic
and explains why it’s being
evaluated/provides rationale
-Defines key concepts/terms
-Describes/outlines relevant
theoretical/empirical support
-Creates a framework for the
essay
Introduction is excellent –
clear, accurate, and concise.
All necessary components
are included and no
unnecessary information is
present.
Introduction is very good –
mostly clear and/or concise.
Necessary components are
included and described with
only minor errors (i.e.,
incorrect statement,
omission/lack of detail, or
unnecessary inclusion).
Introduction is good –
necessary components are
generally included, however,
there is a major error or a
few minor errors (i.e.,
incorrect statements,
omissions/lack of detail, or
unnecessary statements).
A genuine attempt at an
introduction is present, but
there are multiple major
errors (i.e., incorrect
statements, omissions/lack
of detail, or unnecessary
inclusions).
There is no introduction or is
provided but inadequate.
Body/Review of the
Literature (30%)
– Reviews and engages with
key research and/or theories
relevant to the topic to
support a persuasive
argument
– Integrates empirical
research findings with
theories
– Incorporates information
from the provided articles
– Reports relevant
information, including what
the researchers did, what
they found, and what it
means
– Uses examples to support
argument
Literature review is excellent
– clear, accurate, and
concise. All necessary
components are included and
no unnecessary information
is present.
Literature review is very
good – mostly clear and/or
concise. Necessary
components are included and
described with only a minor
error (i.e., incorrect
statement, omission/lack of
detail, or unnecessary
inclusion).
Necessary literature review
components are generally
included, however, there is a
major error or a few minor
errors (i.e., incorrect
statements, omissions/lack
of detail, unnecessary
inclusions).
A genuine attempt at a
literature review is present
but there are multiple major
errors (i.e., incorrect
statements, omissions/lack
of detail, unnecessary
inclusions).
The literature review is
inadequate.
Conclusion (5%)
Conclusion is excellent –
clear, accurate, and concise.
All necessary components
Conclusion is very good –
mostly clear and/or concise.
Necessary components are
Conclusion is good –
necessary conclusion
components are generally
A genuine attempt at a
conclusion is present but
there are multiple major
The conclusion is missing or
attempted but inadequate.
-Provides an overall
summary/integration of the
main points of the essay
-Succinctly reaffirms and
restates the chosen position
-No new ideas introduced
are included and no
unnecessary information is
present.
included and described with
only a minor error (i.e.,
incorrect statement,
omission/lack of detail, or
unnecessary inclusion).
included, however, there is a
major error or a few minor
errors (i.e., incorrect
statements, omissions/lack
of detail, unnecessary
inclusions).
errors (i.e., incorrect
statements, omissions/lack
of detail, unnecessary
statements).
Quality of Critical
Thinking (15%)
– Demonstrates
analytical/critical thought
– Provides a synthesis of the
literature and the argument
(i.e., it is clear how the
literature discussed
contributes to the position
presented)
– Strengths and limitations of
the literature are reported
and used to support the
position and build the
argument
– Ideas are presented in a
logical way that builds the
argument and supports the
position
The critical thinking,
analysis, and synthesis of the
literature is excellent.
Critiques provided are
insightful. Research
evidence and the critique of
the literature are integrated
to build a convincing
argument for the position
adopted. Key ideas are
ordered in a way that builds
the argument to support the
position.
The critical thinking,
analysis, and synthesis of the
literature is very good.
Critiques provided are
generally accurate and these
critiques are used to help
build an argument for the
position adopted. Key ideas
are ordered in a way that
generally builds the
argument to support the
position.
Relevant strengths and
limitations of the literature
are identified. There is
evidence of an attempt to
integrate research evidence
and related critiques. Key
ideas are not always ordered
in a way that builds the
argument to support the
position.
There is evidence of a
genuine attempt to provide
critical thinking, analysis,
and synthesis of the
literature (e.g., strengths and
limitations of previous
literature are identified but
may not be relevant). Key
ideas are generally not
ordered in a way that clearly
builds the argument to
support the position.
There is no attempt at
critical analysis (i.e., no
strengths and limitations are
provided) and there is no
evidence of an attempt to
structure ideas in a way that
builds an argument.
Clarity of Expression
(15%)
– The argument flows
smoothly in a logical manner
from one idea to the next
– Clear and concise sentence
structure
– Thought is given to the
order of ideas to help with
comprehension
– Writing is clear from
grammatical and spelling
errors
Writing is excellent.
Expression is clear and the
essay flows well from
section to section. There are
minimal grammatical and/or
typographical errors (no
more than 1 or 2) and these
do not hinder flow or
comprehension.
Writing is very good with
only 1 or 2 minor lapses in
clarity or flow. There are no
more than a few (3 or 4)
grammatical and/or
typographical errors and
these do not hinder
comprehension.
Writing has more frequent
lapses in clarity or flow.
Numerous grammatical
and/or typographical errors
may be present.
Writing is often unclear and
lacks flow. There may also
be numerous grammatical
and/or typographical errors.
The writing is very difficult
to read. There is a lack of
clarity and flow which
hinders the reader’s
comprehension. There may
be frequent grammatical
and/or typographical errors
which also hinder the
reader’s comprehension.
Adherence to APA Style –
In-text Citations and
Reference List (10%)
In-text citations and
reference list conform to
APA 7th conventions with
minimal errors (e.g., 1 or 2
minor errors in formatting).
In-text citations and
reference list conform to
APA 7th conventions with a
few errors (e.g., 3 or 4 errors
in formatting).
In-text citations and
reference list sometimes
conform to APA 7th
conventions but there are a
In-text citations and
reference list are present but
rarely conform to APA 7th
conventions.
In-text citations and
reference list are missing or
inadequate (i.e., do not
conform to APA 7th
conventions at all).
– Ensure that correct APA
style is followed (i.e., use
the APA Manual)
number of errors in
formatting.
Overall Adherence to APA
Style (5%)
~Pay attention to~
– Presence of title page
– Length
– Spacing
– Font style and size
– Page margins
– Paragraph indenting
– Page numbers present
– Presence and formatting of
running head (APA 6 only)
– Conforms to word length
Essay format conforms to
APA 7th conventions with
only 1 or 2 minor errors in
formatting.
Essay format conforms to
APA 7th conventions with a
few (3 or 4) errors in
formatting.
Essay format sometimes
conforms to APA 7th
conventions but there are a
number of errors in
formatting.
Essay format rarely
conforms to APA 7th
conventions but a consistent
style is adopted throughout.
Essay format does not
conform to APA 7th
conventions and shows no
consistency in formatting.

READ ALSO...   Databases Searching Assignment
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPERNO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER